Anonymous ID: 915519 March 26, 2019, 7:03 p.m. No.5914599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5005 >>5024

>>5908738

>"DAG inquired about our plan re that FISA target if he mobilizes, GIVEN THE PHYSICAL ACCESS HE HAS."

 

>>5909008

>If Sally Yates (SHE) was DAG during this period of time what does (HE) refer to re: DAG?

 

>Was [RR] planned to assume DAG at that point in time?

 

No. No. No. Guys, this has nothing to do with RR. Remember that Yates wasn't even fired until Jan 30 or so in 2017 for insubordination. Then RR was promoted into the position.

 

Parse what Q posted: "DAG inquired about our plan re that FISA target if he {TRUMP!} mobilizes, GIVEN THE PHYSICAL ACCESS HE {TRUMP!} HAS"

 

Q is asking us to focus on THE PHYSICAL ACCESS that TRUMP had in Nov 2016.

 

WHAT PHYSICAL ACCESS DID HE HAVE at that early date after the election? Why would that physical mobility present potential problems to the people wiretapping him?

 

FURTHERMORE, what does this have to do with Q asking us to "play it forward" again from late 2015?