Anonymous ID: 2ba132 March 27, 2019, 1:46 a.m. No.5918677   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5918537

Sorry to keep you waiting anon, I was reading this:

http://www.futurescience.com/emp/EMP-myths.html

http://archive.is/Q1XMM

Well worth the read..

Anonymous ID: 2ba132 March 27, 2019, 2:16 a.m. No.5918826   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5918757

Kek

That is the kind of Wikipedia we don't mind seeing.

BAKER NOTABLE

>>5918757, better let Wikipedia know about this

Seriously though, if they leave it there we'll know they've swallowed, hook line and sinker.

Anonymous ID: 2ba132 March 27, 2019, 2:55 a.m. No.5919002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9016 >>9026 >>9038

>>5918922

Ok, that was me, and I didn't say it would happen. An anon said they had a vision of a mushroom cloud over Auckland, I just pointed out that a low tech way of "air bursting" a mini nuke would be to do it from the Sky Tower, and that the sign in procedures had changed at the staff entrance recently. That coupled with the PM being out of the country that day and that if there was a FF campaign to destabilise society in NZ an attack of that type could be done.

An over active imagination hopefully, I don't actually believe something like that will happen. I said it would be helpful if President Xi could cancel the meeting just in case, but that is probably an overreaction.

Hope that clears it up, kek. In reality there's too many leaps of assumption to make it likely. In probability terms you multiply probabilities, so 0.01 x 0.33 x 4.9 x 0.001 etc. In this case I think that comes out to be a very small number.

Besides, NZ is Nuclear Free, kek.

Anonymous ID: 2ba132 March 27, 2019, 3:14 a.m. No.5919086   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9092

>>5919026

Well that was a relatively small attack, big target admittedly–also played out in Madam Secretary now you remind me of it.

Nuking a few square kilometers of a city is kind of another level, and more like something you'd want to do to a big city?

(GCSB must be having a keyword frenzy right now, kek. Hopefully…)