>>5920191

>>5920226

I am agreeing with id 45f64d

I've noted how overnight notables disappear now for the second day.

I do not understand.

sorry.

>>5920317

noodle me this

you speak in riddlish

non-speak

and you are?

C O M

P E D?

>>5920357

listen, only having one bread of notables is a

sea change

in how the board has been

for months and months.

so be a little bit respectful when someone says

this shit seems different

because we've dealt with assholes for months

and almost keep expecting that the board might get compped again

like it has before

this is a war

so stop showering coals on us

becuase we haven't had enough java yet . . .

thanks for the link to these, I'll look through it

>>5920361

no, you are somebody.

ty for clarifying.

I was worried you were Ba k er

the way that notables disappear and

the bullying associated with it seems

to be that someone is trying to change

the way that the board is used.

>>5920493

I'm not the only one 'noticing'

I'm also reviewing how this effects that the board is used by real people.

not a shill, more of a 'software historian'.

you have to understand what it means. one must now open a new tab to view the notables from a previous bread. this makes it

much harder

much much harder

for certain types of users.

nor has there been, in my estimation,

an analysis of what this does

to the boards servers . . .

so, not a shill

I'm someone who understands

use of software

and how arbitrary

know it all's can

ruin a good thing

through small changes.

and I don't want that to happen here.

>>5920556

I don't want to say that they are compped.

I'm not in a position to know.

this is an issue that BO and CM probably

have to worry about:

the way that a board works might effect

the servers.

the part that makes me pursue it is

how adamant the ones defending their new manner of presenting notables

are,

and how truculent in their ascertains.