>Theory - ATTENTION PLEASE, ANONS:
>The other day I posted a graphic in Research General#7541 (pic related, left image). Graphic displayed similar language between POTUS "Have a great day!" and Q "Have a great night!". I called the graphic "It's been a long day!". (>>5894959 for reference, dunno if that is helpful, newfag).
>I've been thinking a lot about any significance in that lang besides just proving coordination between POTUS and Q. It is a weak proof at best when looked at by itself. Cue mindmelt last night -
>Guys, what if POTUS saying 'good morning' and Q saying 'good night' was meant to show us the length of a day in the Q operation??
>Think about it - Q#2903 (2/26) says "[-21]", big happenings within the next 21 days. The DS would read this as 21 days = March 19, just like we did. Our hype up solidified this in their brains. They burn FF ammo, ect.
>But operators watching would know the REAL length of a day so they can keep up with the mission. Here's my thinking: (pic related)
>POTUS good morning tweet starts our day on 3/24 at 06:01:44am MDT (sorry, all are in mountain timezone). Q goodnight post ends our day on 3/25 at 20:53:57pm MDT. The difference between these two timestamps = 1 day, 14 hours, 52 minutes, 13 seconds -or- 139,933 seconds.
>Applying this new length for a 'day' to Q#2903 on 2/26 at 16:49:44pm MDT could mean that [-21] arrives on
>MONDAY, 4/1 at 17:06:17pm MDT.
>IF this theory is correct, it wasn't MARCH 19, it is APRIL 1. Oh and the time contains 17 TWICE!
>WE VERY WELL COULD STILL BE IN THE [-21] DAY COUNTDOWN! And BIG BIG BIG happenings have definitely happened since 2/26. Why tell us? Idk, maybe because we are so close to the potential deadline it doesn't matter anymore.
>Clock anons, does this have any significance or relevance to patterns in clock research?
>Q - if this doesn't break OPSEC, can you verify? Am I on target?
>Please tear this apart, anons. I am a career lurker since Nov. 2017 with very few posts and no prior chan experience, so this may be wrong and worth little. But once I tested this and it worked (KEK!) I needed to share.
>Thanks! WWG1WGA
Theory - ATTENTION PLEASE, ANONS:
The other day
~~I posted a graphic~~
stopped reading