Theory - ATTENTION PLEASE, ANONS:

The other day I posted a graphic in Research General#7541 (pic related, left image). Graphic displayed similar language between POTUS "Have a great day!" and Q "Have a great night!". I called the graphic "It's been a long day!". (>>5894959 for reference, dunno if that is helpful, newfag).

I've been thinking a lot about any significance in that lang besides just proving coordination between POTUS and Q. It is a weak proof at best when looked at by itself. Cue mindmelt last night -

Guys, what if POTUS saying 'good morning' and Q saying 'good night' was meant to show us the length of a day in the Q operation??

Think about it - Q#2903 (2/26) says "[-21]", big happenings within the next 21 days. The DS would read this as 21 days = March 19, just like we did. Our hype up solidified this in their brains. They burn FF ammo, ect.

But operators watching would know the REAL length of a day so they can keep up with the mission. Here's my thinking: (pic related)

POTUS good morning tweet starts our day on 3/24 at 06:01:44am MDT (sorry, all are in mountain timezone). Q goodnight post ends our day on 3/25 at 20:53:57pm MDT. The difference between these two timestamps = 1 day, 14 hours, 52 minutes, 13 seconds -or- 139,933 seconds.

Applying this new length for a 'day' to Q#2903 on 2/26 at 16:49:44pm MDT could mean that [-21] arrives on

MONDAY, 4/1 at 17:06:17pm MDT.

IF this theory is correct, it wasn't MARCH 19, it is APRIL 1. Oh and the time contains 17 TWICE!

WE VERY WELL COULD STILL BE IN THE [-21] DAY COUNTDOWN! And BIG BIG BIG happenings have definitely happened since 2/26. Why tell us? Idk, maybe because we are so close to the potential deadline it doesn't matter anymore.

Clock anons, does this have any significance or relevance to patterns in clock research?

Q - if this doesn't break OPSEC, can you verify? Am I on target?

Please tear this apart, anons. I am a career lurker since Nov. 2017 with very few posts and no prior chan experience, so this may be wrong and worth little. But once I tested this and it worked (KEK!) I needed to share.

Thanks! WWG1WGA

>>5921357

Theory:

See graphic. Graphic displayed similar language between POTUS "Have a great day!" and Q "Have a great night!".

I've been thinking a lot about any significance in that lang besides just proving coordination between POTUS and Q. It is a weak proof at best when looked at by itself. Cue mindmelt last night -

Guys, what if POTUS saying 'good morning' and Q saying 'good night' was meant to show us the length of a day in the Q operation??

Think about it - Q#2903 (2/26) says "[-21]", big happenings within the next 21 days. The DS would read this as 21 days = March 19, just like we did. Our hype up solidified this in their brains. They burn FF ammo, ect.

But operators watching would know the REAL length of a day so they can keep up with the mission. Here's my thinking: (pic related)

POTUS good morning tweet starts our day on 3/24 at 06:01:44am MDT (sorry, all are in mountain timezone). Q goodnight post ends our day on 3/25 at 20:53:57pm MDT. The difference between these two timestamps = 1 day, 14 hours, 52 minutes, 13 seconds -or- 139,933 seconds.

Applying this new length for a 'day' to Q#2903 on 2/26 at 16:49:44pm MDT could mean that [-21] arrives on

MONDAY, 4/1 at 17:06:17pm MDT.

IF this theory is correct, it wasn't MARCH 19, it is APRIL 1. Oh and the time contains 17 TWICE!

WE VERY WELL COULD STILL BE IN THE [-21] DAY COUNTDOWN! And BIG BIG BIG happenings have definitely happened since 2/26. Why tell us? Idk, maybe because we are so close to the potential deadline it doesn't matter anymore.

Clock anons, does this have any significance or relevance to patterns in clock research?

Q - if this doesn't break OPSEC, can you verify? Am I on target?

Please tear this apart, anons. I am a career lurker since Nov. 2017 with very few posts and no prior chan experience, so this may be wrong and worth little. But tested and works.

WWG1WGA

(Will read now?)