>>5925256 (lb)
Q
Paraphrasing many questions:
"Would I qualify? If so how to get around any past transgressions, and let them know 'experience' not verifiable except here?"
Thought, back then he was pursuing other avenues (maybe retirement). Just going on memory
Q answered that in past.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4280570.html#4280699
That said, Trust & Think for Yourself.
Do what makes sense, and don't waste resources.
We prepare do to possibility of natural disasters.
due*
>Seagrams heiress Clare Bronfman
Didn't find news on the fainting yet:
https://tonyortega.org/2019/03/27/nxivm-judge-calls-emergency-hearing-as-case-thrown-into-chaos-over-mark-geragos-news/
>No, anon. That's not how you shake down an interviewee. What you do is print that screenshot, and save it for the last question, depending on how they do. Then also ask them why they like redheads so much, and watch them squirm.
We could conduct some great interviews together.
Setting up interview questions CIO and CTO couldn't even answer.
"It isn't about how they answer, it is how they handle themselves when unable to answer"
>you've already been investigated
Which is why if still here happy to be a part of it.
Likely to many skeletons to do anything else for some.
You should diversify