>>5929144 PB on criminal government officials selling off America (Uranium One? How about a "Swamp Guard Law"??

The thing that bothers me more than the Uranium One criminal activity here is the question of how often this kind of thing happens and in how many different ways that we are not even made aware of. (Thanks MSM) I am betting this is more common than we think.

I went on vacation out west years ago, and found the Canadians mining American gold in the mines near the little town of Bodie.

And now, there is this "Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States" [See Anons research below] that is never mentioned in the news. I don't think the average American has ever heard of it if they DO pay attention to politics. Here is my logical thinking question.

If YOU were a foreign nation wanting to strip the United States of all of her mineral rights, oil fields, gold mines and ports, would you find it tempting to attempt to buy off the members of this "committee?"

Last I heard, Reed had a deal to let the Chinese build huge mega miles of solar farms on those Bundy type cattle ranches, so the Chinese could charge Americans for the electric? Rumor also has it that Bundy was sitting on Uranium? I can only imagine, was all part of the 16 year plan, putting what we have learned into perspective. Nearly all of the ranchers have been thrown off the land out west, for what.. to make room for the sale of America?

What would your average American say to our legislative committees, giving mineral rights, port control, and other PUBLICLY OWNED assets to foreign governments and businesses to control, instead of American citizens? Last I looked, the Spanish Company Cintas was running the toll booths on Interstate 80? Now we are giving control of the internet away, after paying years of taxes to build it????

It's just one more example. Sickening, don't y'all think? You have to wonder….

Is this why land is no longer given to Americans as it was in the old days for free… to settle? Trust me. There is plenty of public land to settle. I have road tripped all but one highway running east/west, end to end. We do not need to have one person on welfare, if Americans could still settle the vacant land out there. Beautiful grasslands, all empty, and many places would be great to settle and make new little towns etc. You have to wonder……

Is the use of this land now for sale to foreigners in secret deals, and the deals only get shut down if we are lucky enough to have patriots elected that can't be bought off? Or the Military steps in? Check this out from the post last bread. An Anon did great research here: >>5929144

>When a company controlled by the Chinese government sought a 51 percent stake in a tiny Nevada gold mining operation in 2009, it set off a secretive review process in Washington, where officials raised concerns primarily about the mine’s proximity to a military installation, but also about the potential for minerals at the site, including uranium, to come under Chinese control. The officials killed the deal. Such is the power of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.”

"The Committee on FOREIGN Investment into the United States"???? How about the committee on American SETTLEMENT of the United States???? (Continued "Possible high tech solutions" next link)

>>5938305

I don't have the quote here, but I believe it was Thomas Jefferson who said when you have many on welfare, and you still have vacant land, you have a problem with government. 80% of American businesses were started on loans against the main home of the business owners. Imagine what would happen if our poor and our legal immigrants could take loans out on their land and start businesses just like the rail road tycoons and the JP Morgans got to do, back before the income tax and when land was still free to settle. Many globalists got American Land for free back then.

The question is always about a solution, so, let me pick up a bat and swing here, with a preliminary idea.

Not only should we re-start the "50 acers and a mule" law, and a "Louisiana purchase" free land settlement law so Americans can continue to settle the land….but….now that we have the technology…

I think it is time to catch up with our ability to keep a 24/7 eye on those who would dare represent us, using the real time internet cloud capacity we have. Gone are the days where we have to suffer sending elected Americans off to Washington to make decisions for us, which they apparently do to line their pockets with gold as soon as they get there to make "some deals"

Today we have the power to demand [demand by law] that all people who want to represent us in Washington, actually wear a camera and voice recorder while on the job that uploads their activities to the live stream cloud, where ALL OF US can be in the "back room" listening to the "DEALS" being made in real time.

Before you call that ridiculous, think outside the box for a minute, because… this is America, the great experiment in liberty. We always want to make our nation a better Republic than it was when we were born. In one case, this meant getting rid of slavery. In this case, maybe it means using new technology to make government more representative and accountable to the people?

Our soldiers lose many of their rights when they choose to lay down their lives for us and our safety, if called. No one thinks this is asking too much of THEM, right? You can give your life for the country, and die, but, you cant be told you have to record your life and upload it real-time if you want to represent us?

We could finally have true representation without having to worry about them participating in crimes themselves and then attempting to hide their crimes by "classifying them". But there is more upside:

Remember Q said many of the "good" had to cover up and live with the realities of these crimes, because they and their families were threatened????? And then Q said, there were more good than bad? This would protect our good representatives from blackmail attempts, threats etc, since all such encounters would be automatically recorded. We could all be watching to make sure no one ever abused our representatives like this ever again.

Hired criminals would not be able to approach a legislator. Imagine if Seth Rich was wearing a camera?

The internet live streams would scare off evil people, because evil hates the light, and evil people would not dare run for office.

Good reps should not have to face the criminals alone.

I think we need a law to do this.

Thoughts?

>>5938334

I think you are wise wanting to take it slow, but, I also think we have a problem with legislators who go in with good intentions, only to be threatened by the established mob, and I do mean RICO type global organized criminal life threatening mob, so, I was thinking about draining the swamp, and keeping them safe in the future too. As for the courts, I agree. One branch at a time maybe?

>>5938373

For the moment, this is a god send. But, I think even the good people at the NSA would tell us that it is only a matter of time before this system would be retaken by some evil. And, it does nothing for representative government. As long as the NSA is military, the military is on the front lines of freedom, and they actually put their lives on the line, so, I am not bothered by the NSA. But, it is personality dependent instead of representative Republic dependent. Tey have it all, but, can not use it. Even Q has to be careful of what he tells us.

I was thinking more along the lines of a permanent upgrade and solution for the Republic that would put civil control back in the hands of civilians, so the military can stop having to fight the enemies within. A separation between that which is "classified for military purposes" and that which should never be classified in a nation where the people are the ones responsible for knowing what laws and decisions are being made by government. It would be a way to prevent MSM lies, protect good legislators from criminals, prevent bribery, blackmail, and murder attempts etc etc. It would put the truth out for us in primary sources (as the legislation was worked on in real time) rather than having to hear the Pelosi's of the world tell Congress "Well, we have to pass it to find out what's in it"

These people are trying to run a tyranny.

We are a republic.

Just finding a way to have high tech turn it back into a republic.

>>5938447

>>5938447

> "they don't care about us".

I have often thought this was his way of telling us the truth, and why he was suicided. I truly believe he was offed. Something about the whole thing was not right.

>>5938367

>The music industry is heavily controlled and restricted often times to either limited vocabulary, message, theme, and even chords.

>Not to mention the frequency music is recorded at.

You got that right.