Anons I have Intel for you. North Korea. If you dig I past notables from the last day or 2 you can find some of my posts there. I am bringing this here because we need to spread this info fast, so the proper ears and eyes can see it. The public must know. The narrative is being set. Follow this thread of my posts because I will be making a alot.

A false flag involving North Korea is going to happen (or is it? if you act fast enough), but it's more complicated then you think.

To start off, NK's defense and weapon industry has been selling/smuggling weapons out of NK without NK actually knowing about it. This means that for example Muslim groups could use NK weapons to do a terrorist attack in China or some other terrorist groups in Europe or the US could use those weapons in a terror attack. This is already bad enough, but it get worse.

The recently promoted anti-NK "coup group" is going to use NK weapons and do a false flag attack to frame NK for a terrorist attack or if you consider what they supposedly were involved in, an attack on a Embassy which would be an act of war. But don't worry, a double cross is going to happen to them.

The anti-NK "coup group" is going to all be killed off by those who are funding/supporting it to tie up a "loose end" after they have reason to go to war against North Korea. They were never going to be given power in what's left of NK after the war.

>>5937819

>>208020994 #

>What possible motive would they have to do a falseflag?

To frame NK for an attack, to destroy diplomatic relations with NK and between NK and the countries it has relations with or has done arms sales to in the past, to declare war on NK, and to put a group/leader in power that they specially selected.

Also to get rid of the Anti-NK "coup group" who is just a liability.

>Who do they answer to?

Which groups and countries fund the Anti-NK "coup group" and which countries and groups hate the countries NK has been selling/smuggling arms to?.

Which countries and groups gain from doing all of that to NK?. Which countries and groups gain the most from creating war on the Korean Peninsula?

>Would it be safe to assume the attack would be done on a Chinese embassy most likely?

This should be simple to figure out without even asking me. Which countries have sanctions on NK or push for sanctions on NK?.

The false flag narrative would/could be "NK retaliates against the US by attacking an Embassy they have". The scripting is so obvious even a dummy could figure it out

>>5937854

This is new Intel, 2 days old.

I look on Twitter and all I see is MSM talking heads pushing their narrative about this "wonderful" group trying to topple NK. And I see people taking the bait. Know what I don't see? Any Q anons posting about the FF attempt. No one's trying to dissect it. No one's making memes and spreading info. You guys are really letting the MSM run with their narrative. Look at how many articles were written about Cheollima within the past few days. Slacking!

>>5937891

Think timezones. Where is it daytime? What am I posting about? That's why I need more anons to spread the info. Obviously my working day is quite the opposite of most of yours.

>>5937951

I have been posting the Intel I have and no I do not do drugs of any kind. Thanks. I'd be a bit more proactive. The MSM has their narrative set with Cheollima and no ones challenging it. Yes, you may know it's a ruse, but does the general public know? Not at all.

NK is a hermit nation that doesn't communicate with the rest of the world much. This means if something were to be blamed on NK, any response from them is going to be drowned out.

NK has been smuggling/selling weapons to different countries for questionable reasons. This might also be used to justify action against these countries also.

NK hasn't build strong enough alliances around it and it has also not worked with SK to sign a peace treaty to end the Korean War. The Korean War still going on is what gives so many foreign powers power over the Korean Peninsula.

>>5938013

I'm telling you to challenge the MSM narrative. They're painting Cheollima to be some renegade savior group when in reality they are under black hat control trying to keep NK unstable.

What's the narrative being set up? Here's a few fresh articles. Searching Cheollima over the past few days gives you. Any more.

MEDIA BLITZ CURRENTLY GOING ON

>Mexican national led North Korean embassy raid in Spain, local court says

>posted today

https://archive.is/UiC5q

>Cheollima Civil Defense claims responsibility for raid on DPRK embassy in Madrid

>Posted Today

https://archive.fo/GaL17

https://www.nknews.org/2019/03/man-accused-of-madrid-embassy-break-in-is-well-known-north-korea-activist/

>“The world should not wait until crises emerge to react – it can prepare now, today, to soften a future North Korean landing…” promotional material on the organization’s website reads.

https://archive.fo/AEomr

Guardians article posted 50 mins ago

>Secretive group seeking to oust Kim Jong-un claim North Korea embassy raid

>Cheollima: the self-styled 'government-in-exile' fighting to free North Korea

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/27/cheollima-the-self-styled-government-in-exile-fighting-to-free-north-korea

>Cheollima Civil Defence is believed to be the first organised opposition to the dynasty that has ruled North Korea for more than seven decades.

>>5938101

Thank you anon. I will pass this along to the right people.

>>5938088

Think of it this way Kim Jong Un is more of a figurehead. He has a military which controls most of what goes on behind the scenes. There's some loyalists, but many have alliegience with other countries or work in secret with black budget type things. Kim is kept in the dark of some of these matters. Yes, biological and radioactive weapons and projects. Yes, weapon smuggling. Human experimentation I'm not sure of but definitely trafficking. Drugs are not that big of a problem. But you get the point. Black hat groups smuggle and sell to the highest bidder. Whatever and whoever has the cash. These people profit from the instability of NK and will go to war to keep NK unstable.

>>5938210

Thanks for the link. I know at least one or two South Korean anons or expats who know korean float around here. I also have contacts who can help.