Not to mess up the board (I just noticed Q dropped a bunch of new crumbs), but I think this is important.
I was trying to recreate some research I had done earlier at work and I stumbled upon something shocking. The research was in regard to General Flynn's 'guilty' plea for the 'process crime' of lying to the FBI.
The research was for a post I wanted to make. I was going to start by showing links to articles, which reported General Flynn's exoneration by the FBI, which was published on March 23, 2017.
Then I was going to post information about General Flynn's interview with Peter Strzok, which took place at the Whitehouse the following day on March 24, 2017. The latter interview was used to generate the guilty plea. Agent Strzok, as we know, was removed from Mueller's Special Counsel team due to the revelation of his political bias against President Trump (Insurance Policy), was busy having a fling with agent Lisa Page, and either lied about his interview with General Flynn, or as has been alleged, had his '302' form altered in some fashion by disgraced #2 FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
The remaining possibility, which would be nice, was that Flynn was playing 5D chess and knew what Strzok was (sent) to 'interview' Flynn with the purpose of laying the groundwork to entrap him and he went along with the plot and fell on his sword so other investigations could occur and eventually lead to the arrest of the entire corrupt leadership on the 7th floor of the Hoover Building.
We shall see, but Judge Sullivan, who now presides over General Flynn's case, appears to be quite angry about the new revelations he's learning since Flynn's guilty plea and has ordered all exculpatory evidence, not previously disclosed to Flynn's lawyers, be turned over.
Many wonderful essays have been written on this topic if anyone's interested in a refresher course. Sara Carter at Circa News, Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse/Last Refuge, Stealth Jeff @ Twatter, the Hill, True Pundit, Gateway Pundit and others have all done excellent work, to name a few.
That is the background on what I was working on when I noticed this (pics related).
In trying to retrieve the articles I had located at the office I ran a search using these words:
—à general flynn cleared by fbi
As I was using Google I began to notice I couldn't find the articles, which I had earlier found with ease at work. Frustrated, I switched to DuckDuckGo. Read the headlines, which were retrieved using the exact same search! The importance of the implications of this cannot be overstated.
Keep in mind that Google is used by the majority of the country (world perhaps) when doing online research and look at how skewed 'reality' will become when being furnished with your data by Google (previously of 'Do No Evil' fame). The facts are completely inverted. Up is down, down, up. Innocent becomes guilty.
I know other anons have posted about this same topic but I felt my experience might serve as a powerful example of how distorted information becomes due to Google's algorithm/censoring/filtering.
Had I not been knowledgeable about General Flynn being cleared by the FBI on March 23, 2017, and had I not seen articles published in many papers, I would be left thinking it never occurred. This is disgraceful – to but it nicely.