Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 7:29 a.m. No.5940998   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1503

>>5940960

Schiff isn't going to step down. DEMs do not accept responsibility or account for their actions. Ever.

 

Still, the GOP-unanimous letter is good to educate the public, at least put an honest argument in front of the public.

 

But Congress is fundamentally dishonest. That's just the way it is. Maybe 15% of them are fairly honest, and you can count on your fingers how many are "good eggs."

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 7:31 a.m. No.5941027   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1031 >>1043 >>1061

Turner is impugning Schiff in public, and Schiff has to just sit there and take it. Epic.

 

Turner invokes McCarthy. Schiff, your reactions today were pure McCarthyism, as you attacked us rather than defend the work of the committee.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 7:36 a.m. No.5941075   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5941056

Said Schiff should have resigned long ago, and gave excellent reason. I also noticed that he remarked Mueller was appointed to investigate SPY allegation.

 

Hawley agrees with Comey, there should be investigations, but Comey, McCabe, et al are the ones who need to be investigated.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 7:43 a.m. No.5941169   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5941085

I'm the weak sauce anon.

I agree with your analysis, and think the observation is valid. But a 100 like swing (at most) could be attributed to rounding. Not saying rounding is what is happening, by the way. I have the same suspicion you do. My point is that this specific piece of evidence is weak. I would not expect a sudden cut in likes - too obvious (like YT does on the "this will get Trump elected" video) - but if the number of likes does not change in an hour, on a fresh tweet, then yeah, something is suppressing the count.

 

I don't expect Twat to ever work in an honest and transparent fashion. It is run and infested by liberals, and that makes the operation fundamentally dishonest.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 7:47 a.m. No.5941226   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5941110

KEK!

She doesn't have to win to avoid the look, she just has to maintain status as a viable candidate. That is enough to get "untouchable" status from the DOJ .

 

Totally different if she was GOP or worse, independent of the uniparty. See Trump example for how FBI/DOJ and the rest treats threats to their grip on power. Use the government to dispose of them.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 8:02 a.m. No.5941427   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1450

>>5941311

Everything the FedGov touches turns to shit. It got into student loans, and bingo - cost of education (payola and fraud) goes through the roof. Now at crisis stage.

 

Gets into retirement business (SS), and bingo - taxes go up and Ponzi scheme ensues.

 

Gets into home loan business, and bingo - you know the pattern. Cronies are getting rich on the back of honest hardworking taxpayers.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 8:08 a.m. No.5941524   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1602

>>5941450

Everything!

There is sound reason the founders aimed to limit FedGov to mutual interests, and allow the states near complete independence. That went out the window, and by now has flown the coop. The last 70 years have destroyed the substance of federalism, and left a shell of cheap double-talk in its place.

Anonymous ID: 13856c March 28, 2019, 8:19 a.m. No.5941667   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5941602

I wouldn't give the states as much latitudes as you, e.g., communism is a no-no and the RKBA is as fundamental as the right to life.

 

Globalism is a real force, taught in all the poli-sci and politicians and lawyers grooming for positions of power. Concentrating power in ever larger geographic regions (US, EU being examples) is stepping stone. Eventually, what state or country you are from is about as important as the name of the subdivision you live (or lived) in.