>>5942070

notables are suggested reading.

notables go stale

sometimes people are too much about 'muh notable'

then, the urge is to deny them the notable, even if the news is important.

in the case of someone spamming 21 posts . . . I'd say the idea of 'deny' is more about

telling the anon to chill,

than what the content of the notable is.

the anon forgets that he/she is anon.

so that means: your ego and your well being, and sense of self worth ought to be

divorced from the work you do here.

you want it too much.

you get denied.

that's called training.

>>5942228

baker:

"cry baby anon kvetches about 'muh notable'"

as the text of 5942176 notable.

>>5942299

the following is 'just a story':

my buddy told me about this great new performance

in his town and he said he'd make me a video.

So I told him "Well you know I'm old school,

I only have that old TV, it's black&white, and I only have a VHS to watch recordings."

So he said:

"Well that is

old school

but I'll accomodate you" so he sent me a tape.

I watched it and I was horrified. I called him.

"That's the most racist thing I have ever seen. I'm shocked. What the hell is it?"

"no," he assured me. "it's very popular".

"ya?"

"It's called 'Blue Man Group'.