Anonymous ID: 1a6b8f March 28, 2019, 10:12 a.m. No.5943258   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3267 >>3289 >>3365 >>3431 >>3921

>>5943194 (LB)

 

Eric Holder goes on MAGA attack: 'Exactly when did you think America was great?'

 

It turns out New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo isn’t the only prominent Democrat who questions whether America was ever that great.

 

In pointed terms during an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Obama-era attorney general Eric Holder posed the question to MAGA-chanting Trump supporters: "Exactly when did you think America was great?"

 

The comments echoed those of Cuomo, who took heavy criticism for remarking last year that America “was never that great.” Together, both off-the-cuff comments amount to stunning statements from public figures who until recently were considered potential presidential candidates. In both cases, the Democrats took shots at America's past as part of an effort to criticize President Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan.

 

After speaking during Wednesday's MSNBC interview with Holder on topics like criminal justice reform and partisan redistricting – which the ex-AG says is now his focus instead of running for the White House in 2020 – host Ari Melber had asked him: “There is a lot of talk about America being a leader as a democracy, quote unquote, in the 1800s when women and African-Americans couldn’t vote. What kind of democracy is that?”

 

Holder, unprovoked, then used his answer to tear into Trump's campaign rally cry.

 

"That's exactly right. And that's what I hear these things about 'let’s make America great again' and I think to myself, ‘exactly when did you think America was great’?” he said on the show.

 

“It certainly wasn’t when people were enslaved. It certainly wasn’t when women didn’t have the right to vote. It certainly wasn’t when the LGBT community was denied the rights to which it was entitled."

 

Melber then asked Holder if he believes Trump’s 2016 campaign slogan had discriminatory undertones.

 

“Does that phrase echo as discrimination in your ears?” the MSNBC host asked.

 

“It takes us back to what I think, an American past that never in fact really existed. This notion of greatness,” Holder replied.

 

“You know, America has done superb things. It has done great things. And it has been a leader in you know, a whole range of things. But we are always a work in process and … looking back, ‘Make America Great Again’ is inconsistent with who we are as Americans at our best where we look at the uncertain future, embrace it and make it our own.”

 

Holder’s comments Wednesday echo remarks made by Cuomo last year in which he drew gasps and chuckles from an audience by declaring that America “was never that great.”

 

“We’re not going to make America great again. It was never that great,” Cuomo said during a bill signing event in New York last August. “We have not reached greatness, we will reach greatness when every American is fully engaged, we will reach greatness when discrimination and stereotyping against women, 51 percent of our population, is gone and every woman’s full potential is realized and unleashed and every woman is making her full contribution,” he continued.

 

Cuomo’s office later was in damage control mode and said the governor “believes America is great and that her full greatness will be fully realized when every man, woman and child has full equality.”

 

“America has not yet reached its maximum potential,” it added.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eric-holder-when-did-you-think-america-was-great

Anonymous ID: 1a6b8f March 28, 2019, 10:27 a.m. No.5943642   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5943423 (Q in NZ bread)

 

Twitter may annotate Trump's tweets, and those of other officials, if they violate its rules

 

The next time President Trump tweets something that's in violation of Twitter's standards but still newsworthy, the 280-character message might have a note attached to it.

 

Twitter, which has come under fire for years for not doing enough to rid the platform of hate speech and abuse, is examining how it could annotate offensive tweets that break its rules but are still in the public interest, according to Vijaya Gadde, the company's head of legal, policy, and trust and safety.

 

“One of the things we’re working really closely on with our product and engineering folks is, ‘How can we label that?’” Gadde said in a response to questions from The Washington Post at an event in San Francisco. “How can we put some context around it so people are aware that that content is actually a violation of our rules and it is serving a particular purpose in remaining on the platform.”

 

According to the Post, Gadde said the efforts provide additional context will maintain the Jack Dorsey-led company's community standards but also allow the platform to serve as a place for public policy conversations.

 

In Twitter’s present iteration, she told the Post, “when we leave that content on the platform there’s no context around that and it just lives on Twitter and people can see it and they just assume that is the type of content or behavior that’s allowed by our rules.”

 

However, content that is violent or directly threatens harm is where Twitter currently draws a line.

 

“There is absolutely a line of a type of content, an example being a direct, violent threat against an individual that we wouldn’t leave on the platform because of the danger it poses to that individual,” Gadde said. “But, there are other types of content that we believe are newsworthy or in the public interest that people may want to have a conversation around.”

Dorsey has in the past said that core aspects of Twitter could be altered or modified and the company is testing a range of ways to make conversations on the platform more healthy. The CEO has defended keeping Trump's tweets on the site because they are inherently newsworthy, even as Twitter has updated its definition of what constitutes "dehumanization" on the platform.

 

Trump regularly uses Twitter to attack his political enemies, including the late Sen. John McCain, deride media outlets like CNN and he has retweeted unverified anti-Muslim videos.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/twitter-may-annotate-tweets-from-trump-and-other-elected-officials-if-they-violate-its-rules

Anonymous ID: 1a6b8f March 28, 2019, 11:08 a.m. No.5944593   🗄️.is 🔗kun

http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim

 

TREASON & SEDITION