I thought the bump stock ban was gonna be used to allow SCOTUS to make a landmark decision against bumpstocks, was this part of the plan?

www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-guns/u-s-supreme-court-refuses-to-block-trumps-gun-bump-stock-ban-idUSKCN1R9230

>>5945678

against gun control not bumpstocks my bad

>>5945712

Why does it seem Trump is starting to side with gun control a bit, that shan't be the case

>>5945770

what are you testing?

>>5945805

But anon, don't I have a constitutional right to be a dumb faggot that wants to look cool by wasting rounds?