>>5943857 (lb)
If the dates on the watches aren't important, why are they different in two shots taken (presumably) one right after the other? Bit of an effort to go to for something that doesn't matter.
Yes, yes it is. As an NZ anon it really should shock me that I can recognise all of the former US ABC chiefs, Obama's cabinet and prominent members of the current US Congress better than probably 50% of all NZ politicians. But it doesn't, kek.
It's official anons, the government extended the block on 8chan etc. Question is, did they actually instigate it in the first place? And, was it legal to ask for the extension?
ISPs keep Chch web blocks after Govt intervention
New Zealand’s largest internet providers have reversed plans to stop blocking websites which hosted videos of the Christchurch terror attack, after a last-minute intervention by the Government.
In the wake of the mosque shootings, a number of New Zealand’s biggest ISPs took what they themselves acknowledged was an “unprecedented step” - blocking websites which were hosting a video of the attack live-streamed by the alleged murderer, as well as his manifesto.
In an open letter explaining the move and calling for action from larger tech companies, the chief executives of Spark, Vodafone and 2degrees said the decision was the right one in “such extreme and tragic circumstances”.
–
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/03/27/507977/isp-keeps-chch-web-blocks-after-govt-intervention
http://archive.is/9aIw8
Only in New Zealand, kek.
Too busy gabbing to the press, David Seymour misses his opportunity to slow down new gun laws.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-shooting/111727631/act-will-force-government-to-pass-new-gun-legislation-under-urgency
http://archive.is/z4edz
Hansard draft
First reading of the Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill — First Reading
Excerpt:
''Our actions, instead, are directed at making sure March 15th never happens again.
Semi-automatic firearms which are commonly used for hunting, pest control, stock management on farms, and duck shooting will not be affected. People can still use a .22 calibre rifle with a maximum 10-round magazine, and a semi-automatic and pump-action shotgun with a maximum five-round magazine. These firearms are widely and safely used amongst our farming and hunting communities. Indeed, today, the Game Animal Council has confirmed that recreational and commercial hunting of large game animals such as deer, pig, and tahr will largely be unaffected. MSSAs and assault rifles are not needed for hunting or stock management.
There will be a small number of tightly controlled exemptions for professional animal cullers and licensed firearms dealers. Those groups or individuals identified as management agencies under section 100 of the Biosecurity Act can apply to the Commissioner of Police for a permit to possess a prohibited firearm. This will include the sort of pest control work undertaken by contractors for the Department of Conservation or a local council. Those applying will need to demonstrate that they will only use the firearm for that purpose stated and must demonstrate that they cannot do the work with any other firearm.''
Full text:
https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20190402_20190402_16
http://archive.is/jVAYO
On a less serious note, and perhaps a day late, next year there will be no March 15th, and instead we will have a March 32nd.
Don't forget the frame rate and rolling shutter. A lot of weird effects can happen, especially with a rolling shutter.
Good call anon, let's stick to facts.
We know (roughly chronological):
An alleged attack happened
Gun law change process started immediately (announced within hours on same day?)
Any social media sites he posted on were blocked by major ISPs (except for Facebook, Instagram, Twitter) within hours
Sites he didn't use were also blocked (gab, dissenter, …? )
video was banned immediately (I don't actually recall when that was, pretty sure on the day)
PM claimed location of attacks were not in manifesto (we, NZers, can't legally prove otherwise now because… )
manifesto banned as objectionable material several days later
Media labeled him variously as far-right, alt-right, and white supremicist (which he claimed to be, but we can't legally counter the first two because of the above)
ISPs about to remove self initiated blocks asked not to by govt (Chris Fa'afoi) ostensibly until after memorial service (still blocked?)
he is de-named (holy shit, that's in my swipe prediction, never used it before kek) by the PM in her speech in Parliament (and yes it's fukken her, smh)
alleged perpetrator claims abuse in prison (didn't pay too much attention to that, kek)
Auckland Mosque cleric (?) claims the action is initiated by Israel (no sauce tho)
Jeremy majorly trolls Jewish Council (or something) spokeswoman on 7 sharp
judge rules no cameras allowed for court proceedings (TV cameras usually allowed in court in NZ but do get excluded sometimes, not spoopy)
debate about whether to use his name in media coverage, whether the court has the power to prevent that for trial coverage, etc.
All the rest is noise, except for the people who died, who I believe certainly did, but for the sake of examining this as an action by an unknown state or non-state agency to force a particular narrative, social, or law change, the rest is irrelevant. The attack (allegedly) happened, the social changes happened, internet blocks happened, the gun laws are changing, and a trial is going to happen.
Now, I think kiwis are on legally shaky ground discussing this matter which is currently before the courts (lawfags?) so I will refrain until after the (alleged) fucker hangs trial. We just need to pay attention to any details that emerge that could tie him to other agents (for lack of a better term). That's the next chance we'll get to uncover any skullduggery, or to be satisfied that he (allegedly) acted alone and is just a deranged fuck-knuckle.
Apologies for any missed allegations, this anon supports law and order.