>>6612390
>Can you explain how this could be a honey pot?
Let's say the sis are trying to find those mythical "white supremacists".
I was going to write a comment in dissenter but thought i'd get there organically first as i had opened the link originally through my epic browser set to east coast usa proxy.. but wanted them to see that i was a kiwi by ip. Led me to not find article.
>Its a clearnet link
exactly, click it and they have your ip. and your address if they are sis. also note the extra code gobledygook after the address.
>the fact that comments are disabled (pic related) suggests they would rather the story wasn't there.
the fact that comments are disabled suggests they are scared of free thought breaking their narrative.
>quite an accusation to make, dontcha think?
Nope i stand by the suggestion that they didn't get the story from the original site, maybe they did, but mpre likely it was a link on another site.. I'd like to know what site and will dig for that tonight…
>I dug a little further than you
Thanks for finding it was archived on the wayback.. suggests that they have had second thoughts about this particular narrative…
I am impying that the O.P. has stumbled on something, the article is now highly suspect and O.P by posting the link is under suspicion till he she explains..
Motivation is to find all you white supremacists.. and that aint me cuz i'm brown