>>6014974

Just checked & I can finally get back on the board – have missed being able to get on here.

Hey, I know there’s only a few minutes left before submissions are due on the new gun bill but it contains a horrible clause:

74A Order in Council relating to definitions of prohibited firearm, prohibited magazine, and prohibited ammunition

The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister,—

(a) amend or replace the description in section 2A of a semi-automatic firearm (except a pistol) or pump action shotgun that is a prohibited firearm:

(b) amend or replace the description in section 2B of a magazine that is a prohibited magazine:

(c) declare any semi-automatic firearm (except a pistol) or pump-action shotgun of a stated name or description to be a prohibited firearm for the purposes of this Act:

(d) declare any magazine of a stated name or description to be a prohibited magazine for the purposes of this Act:

(e) declare any ammunition to be prohibited ammunition for the purposes of this Act.

Orders in Council are done by the Executive Council and don’t follow our normal submission process

https://dpmc.govt.nz/our-business-units/cabinet-office/executive-council

My reading of this is that the government can make a lot of guns illegal without any public consultation at all. Just whip up an order in council and presto it’s done (which is what Cindy did back in December to loosen the vetting process anyway)

If you’re in NZ & you see this before 6pm then please make a submission against this clause at least.

>>6028569

Additional notes about gun law changes in NZ:

Law and order committee held "Inquiry into issues relating to the illegal possession of firearms in New Zealand" started 16 March 2016, reported back 7 April 2017.

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/business-before-committees/document/00DBSCH_INQ_68642_1/inquiry-into-issues-relating-to-the-illegal-possession

The government at the time (National Party under Bill English) disagreed with all recommendations (this was a couple of months before an election). The report included suggestions for clarifying the classification of MSSAs (pg 6 of report) and tightening up on vetting processes. They said they would do a full review but a change of government put paid to those plans.

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/papers-presented/current-papers/document/PAP_74355/government-response-to-the-report-of-the-law-and-order

Arms (Firearms Prohibition Orders) Amendment Bill was attempted to be introduced in May 2018 as a private members bill by National Party MP Chris Bishop. The current govt voted against it. After reading the speeches I'm not sure this would've made any difference to Chch. It also appeared to contravene the Bill of Rights.

How's this for the current governments stance:

13823 (2018). Chris Bishop to the Police (Minister - Stuart Nash) (09 Jul 2018): What form is the government review of firearms policy taking?

Hon Stuart Nash (Police (Minister - Stuart Nash)) replied: I am following the established process of seeking advice from my officials prior to wider consultation.

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/order-paper-questions/written-questions/document/WQ_13823_2018/13823-2018-chris-bishop-to-the-police-minister-stuart

Here's another good question:

16912 (2018). Hon Christopher Finlayson to the Police (Minister - Stuart Nash) (24 Aug 2018): What are the start and end dates of the firearms policy review?

Hon Stuart Nash (Police (Minister - Stuart Nash)) replied: A review of the policy related to the Arms Act commenced in March 2018. The extent of that review is still being scoped so it is not possible to provide an end date at this time.

I didn't come across anything about a review in March 2018 info and why didn't he say a review had been started in March when he was basically asked the same question in July?

And then Chch happened & everyone's in a rush all of a sudden to get changes to gun legislation done. The public get 2 days to put in submissions on legislation which has some potential fish hooks for innocent parties and only selected face to face submissions - one day only (how does the Muslim community get two slots??)

>>6338971

If the Anons are right & Q has taken control of FB, Twatter, etc & the heads of these social media companies are playing their roles in the movie (or else) then Cindy is wasting her time.

DJT just met with Jack so I'm not sure why Cindy thinks she will have greater sway than what Trump has. She must be deluded by all the international media fawning going on.

This meeting has to be Deep State related - NZ is falling apart & our PM is off to fight for something that won't put food on people's plates back home. Same with Macron - his people have been protesting for 25 weeks in a row. I'm sure they love the fact that he's spending time trying to fix something unfixable rather than help his people out of poverty. Will this push them over the edge?

I've learned that whenever something sounds ridiculous or just doesn't make logical sense then it must be DS related.

Wonder what else might happen on May 15. There's certainly some interesting Q drops from that time 12 months ago.

We've heard that the elite are building underground bunkers in NZ right? This guy tries to find them. I won't spoil the ending but make sure you watch it all. "Hunting the One Percent's Doomsday Bunkers in New Zealand"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh1JZVjKUAo

>>6490497

8chan not banned in NZ anymore. It was only banned for a couple of weeks in March.