>i personally don´t want the board to be flooded with muh jew spam and no anons responding.
but why that in particular? just that?
muhdick is ok? he posts pretty damn awful stuff.
tiresias is ok? he spams non-stop about bots, that's easily weaponized against us too.
funny,
>i can not recall the MSM articlerefering to
>a bunch of nazis.
i can, however, recall plenty of articles latching onto all sorts of dumb stuff, a lot of it completely fake and not even posted here, but on twitter and discord and who knows where.
>muh jew is shilling.
>and this needs to be said.
>you will have to live with me and other anons doing that.
>free speech, ya know?!
of course we can't stop you.
that's why we/i asked.
if you were an anon in good faith, you would be able to understand.
you chose not to.
you chose to shill, and admit doing so.
very telling.
>are you so desperate that you have to alter the green taxt to lay words in my mouth?
Nothing was altered, a part was edited out to rephrase.
>leave the lodge.
Non-Sequitur.
2 deflections, nothing adressed.