On "the question:"

There is little point in asking a question we know the answer to. I have known, since very early on with this whole movement, that Q was not only highly placed, but part of something truly international in scope and scale. I'll leave that whole story for someone I have chosen should they ever want to hear it… But suffice it to say that I felt all of this in my bones and to the core of my soul.

Moving beyond dramatic prose, there is value in who asks the proverbial question and how it is asked. It must come from someone genuinely seeking answers, in my opinion. It has no meaning if Hannity asks about Q.

If I were writing the script for this show, I would want the question to actually come from someone "from the left." Not a big media juggernaugt or some social media whores. I would want it to be someone who had their eye on this movement 'from the other side', who has started to question things.

I would actually have it be someone outside of American media proper. Preferably a genuine, honest activist who wants to do good in the world and has avoided being worn down into a spitting lunatic, yet still has felt disenfranchised by the status quo.

To see such a person from a rather humble background stand before the most powerful man in the world and ask an honest question, that was given an honest, no-bullshit answer….

I have someone in mind, honestly, and while I have no choice but to defer to the plan, it would be the only "(you)" I truly ask for. If not the person I have in mind (there are limits to what I can know about that person), someone fitting that bill is who I would have in that type of position.

Everyone wants their cookie for doing work, for being loyal, etc… The cookie I want is both the biggest one and the most unusual. I want to see "the left" saved. Not just in a sense of "I want us to be right and them to understand it" - but, for example, the person I have in mind had dreams of being able to go to places like Africa and build wells. I see nothing wrong with that goal to help, basically, unfuck the third world. There are pitfalls to be avoided, sure - but this was a person who came from abuse, who came from a fucked up scenario and managed to persevere in many ways.

The cookie I want is for all of us to be able to realize that we aren't each other's enemy and to set about building that better world. MAGA leads to a wealthier and more peaceful public who can pursue things we currently see as frivolous…. Or are outright sabotaged by the CIA, who thrive off of collapsed worlds amid ivory spires.

It's a cookie I'm willing to work for and make happen on my own, but when Q is offering to do the heavy lifting for a lot of things, an scene as poetic as what I described would go a very long way, I think.

Hell… I was pretty damned sure, four years ago, that I would be neck deep in a civil war, judged an international villain, and be in a situation where 'useful idiots' simply had to be killed. The fact that Q is here is part of the most ideal scenario I conceived for these times. So … If I am granted the cookie that gives more cookies - that is the glass of milk, I suppose.

Or… I don't know… When you give a dragon a cookie, it claims it was the one to bake it? We dragons are nothing if not wrapped in our ego. But, I suppose there are worse ways one's ego can manifest.

>>5958190

Let's say you write up a story around the year 2003 revolving around a group of prior military and black program types who, in the 80s and 90s, formed a secret society built around black program tech/methods.

Let's say the story revolved around their role in a civil war that unfolded around the year 2018 and would draw in China and other nations looking to capitalize on various resources.

Let's also say that a key point of the story was genetically modified humans who had been released into the background population following the collapse of funding avenues for projects most of Congress didn't even know about, and their role in the civil war would be instrumental.

Let's also say the story contained incarnated angels and beings of greater spiritual power, and culminated in a repelling of a recon-in-force 'invasion' of hostile aliens around the date of 2025.

There's no point in me proving such things to be true here - but if you were such a person who conceived of such a story in his early teens, then in 2017, an entity like Q shows up… The concept of absurdity takes on a whole new meaning.

As for the dragon - I was born in the year of the Earth Dragon, and have taken quite a liking to the symbolism of the Yellow Dragon.

"Behold the absurdity of dragons." What we say becomes reason, which is extremely similar to the concept of "future proves past."

Or we could just be insane. But at least we are never short on adventure in our lives.

>>5958362

I'm not sure how the B-1 ejection seats work, but it should be rather similar to how others work. When you pull the handle, explosive bolts in the canopy fire. Following that, an explosive "rocket" goes off beneath the seat and vaults whoever is in the seat into the air high enough to deploy the chute even if at ground level and zero airspeed.

The idea of doing that in a bomber is a little terrifying, to be honest. That's a small hole over your head to get blasted through.