5959654
wow, the fallacy of high IQ.
is that what your grandma told you?
and you believed her
I'm sorry I'm triggered today
by the boasting of supremicist shills.
I'll try to tame it down.
wouldn't resepct her as much if she
made her husband a cuckold.
He's got a right to be a jabbering jackass.
what are you going on about?
if Q is a LARP?
if you think so then please just go away.
if Q wants you to think it's a LARP
then Q will screw with you to convince you of that . . . (just kidding)
The only people who are saying it's a LARP
now are those who are doing it as misinformation
to keep the adversaries
from believing that Q should be taken
seriously.
Even if Q were as you conjecture,
this board is still useful for friends of POTUS and MAGA movement.
it is a term used by a subset of people
who seem to be
about controlling others
without their will
so 'useful' isn't the point.
It tells me what kind of narrative I'm reading, the
orientation of the person writing it
dehumanizes people
as evidenced by using that word.
Maybe I'm wrong?
you mgith have useful things to say,
but I stop listening because
the personality type of a person who talks like that
displeases me.
here is another point:
it might be that I am just triggered and
should open up my mind.
like I don't get past it when peole use slur words for other groups . . .
i shut off the input channel.
do you understand?
blacklisted news has a Q headline today.
TY
inside lingo for
Operational Research
the control culture.
It's a useful concept however
it might be better to use
a synonym because it triggers me, so
it must trigger others.
so I am hearing that it is basically it's 'what triggers'
'what might trigger'
'what they can get away with doing' before 'people revolt'
As far as arguments about
acceptible horrible deeds,
to think that a 'window' allows one
to do the dasterdly things,
like the movie that Seth Rogan made where
he was going to NK and . . .
what happened to a character based upon
a real guy (who met with POTUS) . . .
anyone even discussing doing that is a bad
person in my
estimation and thus,
it's never OK to do that.
and there is no 'window' that opens to
make it morally acceptible to do what
is done sometimes.
justified by buzzwords about
'windows of opportunity'
so that means that using the word
seems to imply
that a person will conjecture in a way
that if the path of action followed
would result in horrible actions against
real people, and that it's someohow
ok for it becuase???
someone made up a concept about a 'window' which is a loose analgy about
public acceptance?
if it's a sin it's a sin
doesn't matter if the public wants that sin
its still wrong.
so ya, a concept.
so you use the term now to say
what these disrespectful plotters were thinking about
to justify and get away with criminal actions: because of a 'window' that is a concept
that should just be used
in the Operational Research office
and never discussed outside of it because
it's controlfreak creepiness.
so yes, the term is useful. Howefver, using it does imply a certain subset of peole
who many of which seem to have no problem conjecturing
about doig horrible things
as long as they think
that they can get away with it.
So if you use that term,
you will loose a sensative part of your audience
who cna not fathom the criminal behaviors
suggeseted.
For example the movie with Seth Rogan
was a disgrace and made me
loose all respect for Seth
no matter how bad Kim was portrayed
in the tainted media my thought was
"it's a real guy, he can be redeemed."
if you wonder which
subset
i don't mean
'submissives'
I mean those in a field called
"Operational Research"
they are who I mean
TY again.
I'll read farther and review your work better now.
I've learned somethign today.
basically the word that people use to say 'trigger' triggers me.
now that I've learned that I won't let it do it.
I'll open my mind and read further.
and I hve you to thank for that.