>>5960046 pb

That would be great?

Stop the "Escape?"

or any "Bolthole" exodus?

To report twitter effects / suppression

I tweeted for the whole day.

Not one view increase.

An account I made as a lark [some sites want to verify you through a social media account]

had thousands of views. and only a miniscule number of tweets, virtually none during the same time period.

Some of what I tentatively conclude

Q gave us the names of the "influencers " who were targeted by the Dems

Some, if not all, are followed by Q researchers and Patriots.

Next.

There's a rally and certain Twitter accounts are brought front and center ["you are the news" "You are 'Q'"]

All those accounts have tagged themselves with a flag

There is a lawsuit just begun by Devin Nunes.

Can the anons connect the dots here?

PROOF OF MASSIVE SUPPRESSION OF THE USA flag and the accounts of Patriots.

I'm not going to dox myself.

Others on the same path would've noticed the same thing.

Some associate Patriot by accident was shifted to an account named "drafts" while on twitter - It had all his tweets which hadn't been sent out.

I think a tweet yesterday would be seen by the person replied to along. So if they "liked" it , it would appear to the Patriot who sent it that the Tweet had actually been sent;

when it had not.

Yesterday was an election rally , since POTUS has declared himself a candidate.

So all this counts as election interference.

>>5960547

I think a tweet yesterday would be seen by the person "REPLIED TO" ALONE.

corrected ^^^^

>>5960620

no

You're making me laugh.

Stop.

>>5960692

"Jones" Just another pig who is going down

>>5960705

yeh, but we knew that

But the shills just pretend to "misunderstand"

>>5960743

That's so funny.

They also blamed Trump for "Trump Collusion Delusion"

He's the one who made it big for two years,

Prez DJT promoted it.

Wow, these scum fit the profile of lawyers who lie.

>>5960772

He'll commit suicide because of the stress.

Jump out of a tall building?

>>5960760

>>5960789

"Just getting started"

rested and calm-ish

>>5960547

>>5960573

Shared about suppression on Twitter, but hold back from posting proofs,

Don't want to dox

Too easy to dox from that?

I think it should be Notable Baker

Though I know it's poor form to nominate one's own.

>>5960547

>>5960573

It's analysis in that I'm putting together what I learned from my own experience and from another on-line Patriot.

So it's primary data; not reflected from another's report.

This type of thing is hard to ever get into Notables.

Because there's no "outside source"

yet.

Whatever.

I try to be detached.

I've thought this about the "Notables" for a long time. "Sourced" material even if by a tainted "official" source, is granted Notable.

Maybe it's good since "Notables" is by nature conservative; and our goal is to reach out to the public?