Anonymous ID: 4b35f8 March 29, 2019, 12:11 p.m. No.5964896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4985 >>5027 >>5119 >>5308 >>5367 >>5489 >>5580

>>5949354 pb all

>>5957862

>>5957870

>>5964149

 

While most of the attention on SpyGate has been focused on corruption at the highest levels within DOJ/FBI, less scrutiny has been given to the State Department’s and John Kerry’s likely involvement:

 

Questions have been raised about Victoria Nuland, a senior official in John Kerry’s State Department.

 

In their book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, authors and reporters Michael Isikoff and David Corn write that Nuland gave the green light for the FBI to first meet with Steele regarding his dossier’s claims. It was at that meeting that Steele initially reported his dossier charges to the FBI, the book relates.

Other State officials reportedly interfaced with both Steele and Clinton confidante Sidney Blumenthal regarding the dossier.

 

https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/aaron-klein/quick-takes-120/2019/03/27/

 

The FVEY network was needed to plant the fabricated information in the dossier and give the information an air of legitimacy and legality. Basic logic would indicate that such involvement would require diplomatic contacts with the highest levels of the foreign governments involved in providing the information. We now know that the foreign involvement was largely from the UK because of Christopher Steele (MI-6/SIS). But such incendary information would almost have to include the highest care and political involvement from the US and UK Governments. UK’s Prime Minister at the time was David Cameron. Such consultation and coordination would necessarily involve the State Department and John Kerry.

 

Furthermore, remember the Russian spy, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who entered the country to set up Don Jr in the Trump Tower meeting? It seems that the visa for her to enter the country was approved by the State Department not the DOJ, which was the usual method. Therefore, it’s likely that John Kerry was involved in the setup from the get-go.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-us-otc-veselnitskaya/how-did-russian-lawyer-veselnitskaya-get-into-u-s-for-trump-tower-meeting-idUSKBN1D62Q2

 

It’s not the first time Kerry got directly involved in approving a visa as a political favor:

 

According to the indictment, Netanyahu then called Kerry, and raised the issue again in a face-to-face meeting with the secretary of state. Milchen's visa was later extended for 10 years.

 

https://www.axios.com/how-john-kerry-got-tied-up-in-netanyahus-indictments-33313c14-4aed-4fd0-9dfa-758ca399ec54.html

Anonymous ID: 4b35f8 March 29, 2019, 12:47 p.m. No.5965367   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5949354 pb all

>>5957862

>>5957870

>>5964149

>>5964896

 

Strange links between Jerome Corsi and John Kerry and possibly Spygate. Keep in mind the crushing bias of New Yorker Magazine (and Corsi’s checkered reputation) when reading this, but the info is interesting:

 

In his early years, Corsi “began consulting for government agencies, work that seems to have pushed him further to the political right. Under contract with a unit of the Department of Justice, Corsi later wrote, “one of my assignments was to work undercover with the FBI to penetrate the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), a vocal organization of anti-war activists whose public figurehead at the time was none other than John Kerry.”

 

The turning point in Corsi’s career came in 2004, when Kerry ran for President. Corsi teamed up with John O’Neill, who served with Kerry in Vietnam, and they rushed out a deeply misleading book, called “Unfit for Command,” which accused Kerry of falsifying and exaggerating his Navy combat record as a commander of a Swift boat.

 

“John Kerry would like many people today to view his service in Vietnam as one of honor and courage,” the authors wrote. “But the real John Kerry of Vietnam was a man who filed false operating reports, who faked Purple Hearts, and who took a fast pass through the combat zones.”

 

As the Kerry campaign temporized about whether to ignore the slurs or respond to them, the book reached No. 1 on the Times best-seller list. Douglas Brinkley, a Presidential historian at Rice University, who wrote “Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the Vietnam War,” told me, “Corsi’s book is filled with falsehoods, a fake history masquerading as some kind of truth. It was an unvetted attack document, a political hit job—but the important point is that it worked. Kerry never figured out how to respond to it, and he lost.

 

So the book created a niche and fuelled other false narratives, like the birther movement, with Obama.”

 

Corsi would publish “Where’s the Birth Certificate?: The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President.” Written with sneering condescension, and featuring racially inflammatory chapter headings such as “The Strange Case of the Obama Mama,” the book never came close to proving its thesis—that Obama was born in Kenya. It, too, was a best-seller.

 

Was the Mueller investigation’s scrutiny into Corsi motivated (partially) as retaliation for his previous attacks on Obama and Kerry?

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/02/18/roger-stones-and-jerome-corsis-time-in-the-barrel

 

On the surface it would appear Meuller’s attempt to tie Corsi with direct involvement in conspiring with Wikileaks was tenuous at best. Mueller never brought any charges against Corsi, although he reported the experience as being brutal (he even wrote a book about it already) and the matter is the subject of an ongoing lawsuit against the DOJ

 

Corsi has alleged through his lawyer that he was subjected to warrantless surveillance by federal authorities; that the special counsel’s office illegally leaked details about secretive court proceedings to reporters; and that defendants threatened to sabotage his “business and contractual relationships” unless he perjured himself in the Russia probe.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/20/doj-seeks-dismissal-of-patently-insubstantial-laws/