>>5968767

Trolling big time. Mind fuk for gork

>>5968917 notables are not endorsements. It was a op of a post Q referenced. It’s notable.

>>5968957 leave it in Baker, it’s fine. Q indirectly responded to it as the post Q replied to agreed with it.

>>5968963 c’mon. See my above post to you and to the one kvetching.

>>5969432

Many don’t like you, glowfaggot.