>>5968741

Baker please remove the following notable:

>>5968386 ATTN PRESS / MSM / NEW HERE?

>>5968672 lb

>it was in a reply chain from Q

I don't understand – did Q endorse this post?

>anons can make up their own minds.

This is the "why not?" standard, which is a cop out.

>several anons nominated it

It's not a voting system, either.

Objective standards: Relevant, sauced, novel.

When as many anons voice reasoned arguments AGAINST a post as being non-factual, it's best NOT to note it.

This post does NOT represent us.

Respectfully request you remove from notables.

>>5968753 lb

>not sure why 3 notable nominations

We're inundated with shills atm

Anons gotta stay alert.

>>5968802

Mother FUCK!

>>5968957, >>5968963

Thank you, baker. Appreciate your adjusting to anon feedback. And thanks for baking.

>>5969022

Yeah no worries, baker. You did good. We all get caught not knowing what decision to make in the moment, gotta make calls on the fly.

What really matters is being willing to reflect and reassess. Far too few ppl in this world capable of that anymore. Really glad to have it in a baker. TY.