Anonymous ID: d4ab4a March 29, 2019, 4:03 p.m. No.5968964   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5968917

What exactly is wrong with the statement? As a strategist, it is with specific purpose and created with care. Something has to be said without getting into the trap of being apologists for you shills

Anonymous ID: d4ab4a March 29, 2019, 4:06 p.m. No.5969018   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5968965

>preachy and more or an attempt to control the narrative, whereas now it is toned down to the point of being fully MAGA

Waiting for your proof of this claim

Anonymous ID: d4ab4a March 29, 2019, 4:13 p.m. No.5969130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9193

>>5969060

I noticed some of the shilling slowed down, probably for a regroup. The attacks over it, without any specifics as to what is wrong with it, makes the case. I got one shill to crack the other day and they know it. Whining about his dad having to pay the government 70k per year and some such. As a strategist, there is more to it that makes it hard for them to actually respond to. Read it carefully. It uses their tactics against them. It’s a blanket rejection, of countless shill topics, without giving them any YOUS

Anonymous ID: d4ab4a March 29, 2019, 4:28 p.m. No.5969401   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9494

>>5969316

I never “called for it”. I actually said I thought it should be at the end of the dough to BTFO the smear of the board. You seem to have an issue with it, without citing any words from it as why.