Anonymous ID: 2046b0 March 29, 2019, 6:04 p.m. No.5970903   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0914

>>5970816

 

Under normal circumstances I would agree, however I would argue that the indirect reply by Q gives it added weight.

 

Furthermore, I notice you didn't address the actual contents of the post itself, but merely attempt discredit by the way it's being presented. Do you disagree with any of the ideas expressed in it?

Anonymous ID: 2046b0 March 29, 2019, 6:16 p.m. No.5971090   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5970867

 

The reason for the offence and concern is because it makes the shills' job that much harder. Their tactics are becoming much more noticeable as events unfold. This is why they refuse to confront the post itself and insist that it be ignored due to being copypasta, while churning out the same tired /pol/ speak.