Q didn't (you) this.
This was BTFO
>>5966972 (PB):
>Attacks increasing?
>Context of drops mislabeled and used?
>Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
I replied to your copy pasta yesterday saying that it's useless to 'advise' the MSM because it's THEM doing it so they have material for their shitty articles.
The post, it seems, was deleted. Funny, uh?
SIMPLE LOGIC anons.
The MSM doesn't want our advise. That's the reason.
They are here to find material to smear. AND THEY POST IT THEMSELVES.
It's just a useless copy pasta about something I guess all anons understand.
I'm sure you will
Live long enough to become a shill, I guess.
Reminds me of 'bush flipped' cry for notable
Anons have no ego
True, and
>Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
Seems quite clear in meaning for anyone that can actually read
Anyway my last post on this, not worth it