ATTN PRESS / MSM / NEW HERE?

When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:

http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.

They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.

Thus these ruses are easy to spot.

The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.

If it is hate based, it is paid / fake

They will out themselves by attacking this post, It’s VERY obvious if you are here for long.

NOTHING Q has said supports these narratives.

Thanks For Playing, Come Again

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

WWG1WGA

>>5970376

I’m adding the rt’s to what I post to make the point clearer. Thanks anon

>>5970389

>>5966972 rt >>5966583 rt >>5966470

>>5970449

Really…your opinion doesn’t override my speech and I will post it daily, and any time I’m here. Count on it

>>5966972 rt >>5966583 rt >>5966470

>>5970500

Lol, without any actual reference to the message which is pathetic.

>>5970484

I think it would be most effective at the end of the dough personally. No need for global notes. Based on how newfags would be they might not understand

>>5970500

You know what makes you glow so much? Point to any part and make the case for why it is harmful to what we are doing ? How is it not a good thing to at least BTFO the narrative? It makes no sense logically.

>>5970702

I wrote it, so I won’t push that, I leave that to anons.

>>5966972 rt >>5966583 rt >>5966470 (ALL PB)

>>5970719

You sure have been deebly goncerned about this post. Memeanon liked it. Seems to counter the attacks in a good summary for newfags. Exactly what is in it that has offended you so much ? Anon keeps asking for specifics in respect to the content.

>>5970949

I have seen more appreciate it than not. It seems to trigger shills a lot. It probably defeats the purpose to post it once when it deflects the attacks and given it seems to be well intentioned it isn’t spamming or shilling. It should really be in the dough so anon doesn’t have to keep doing it or something like it vs letting the narratives stand without any remote effort to counter it.