ATTN PRESS / MSM / NEW HERE?

When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:

http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.

They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.

Thus these ruses are easy to spot.

The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.

If it is hate based, it is paid / fake

They will out themselves by attacking this post, It’s VERY obvious if you are here for long.

NOTHING Q has said supports these narratives.

Thanks For Playing, Come Again

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

WWG1WGA

>>5966972 (pb) rt >>5966583 (pb) rt >>5966470 (pb)

>>5971085

>>5971105 example (always posting 24x7)

>>5971104 example

>>5971461

Still fighting about it for whatever reason I see. I wrote it, I post it. And I will continue. I don’t need your approval for my strategy towards this issue. Anyone pretending its “bad” can’t ever articulate a response. Is your aim to improve it? Do nothing at all? Or just silence someone you don’t agree with? That sure isn’t going to happen. Is it that hard to ignore for you? Pretty weak

>>5971551

I think it was replied to indirectly as indicated. It was also relevant to what Q was saying about their attacks. Why don’t you type up something more effective with your brilliance.

>>5971594

That’s how I saw it too. But it doesn’t matter. I’m going to do it regardless. “Attacks intensifying” while laying traps doesn’t seem to equal “sit back and pretend you’re not being set up…” That just isn’t logical to me. But the attacks call for doing nothing, which seems to be directly at odds with what makes the most sense. I crafted it to not give any (you)’s to any given topic, so it would cover the broad range of them, using their own wordplay against them. That’s why they took a break to regroup after Q posted and added any credence to my approach.

>>5971594

I think critics that don’t have a better solution with similar objectives should be viewed with healthy skepticism

>>5971620

Since it first surfaces on halfchan division fag

>>5971620

And I don’t use Facebook or Twatter or any of the various surveillance … being I have enough sense to know better. You still use that shit anon? How long have you been here? /s