Anonymous ID: 7c321b March 29, 2019, 11:43 p.m. No.5975034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5055 >>5058 >>5084 >>5167

ATTN PRESS / MSM / NEW HERE?

 

When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:

http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.

 

They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.

Thus these ruses are easy to spot.

 

The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.

 

If it is hate based, it is paid / fake

They will out themselves by attacking this post, It’s VERY obvious if you are here for long.

NOTHING Q has said supports these narratives.

 

Thanks For Playing, Come Again

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

WWG1WGA

 

>>5966972 (pb) rt >>5966583 (pb) rt >>5966470 (pb)

It’s apparent that “news” reports about qanon are relying on posts made specifically to support their narrative. These reports grossly mischaracterize QAnon and our work.

Anonymous ID: 7c321b March 30, 2019, 12:20 a.m. No.5975318   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5975279

I think it was just for the Dem election coverage. Their “dem bench” was a bit light to appear less one sided for that coverage. You have Dem debates starting in June. But maybe more. It just seems like prepping for another election cycle. It isn’t unusual. A bit early. Perhaps over the mueller findings…