Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 5:39 a.m. No.5976627   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6645 >>6648 >>6651

>>5976552 (l/b)

The cabal wants a cashless society. Imagine a time when banks across the globe have control of all our money and all they do is transfer it between banks, while the elite skim in the process. There would be no way of bringing down a corrupt bank by withdrawing one's money in cash a la Northern Rock bank run in 2008. We'd all be trapped in the system with no way out. Resist a cashless society as though your life depends on it - it does. Use cash, keep cash under the mattress, anything it takes but RESIST the push towards a cashless society. If or when it is ever achieved, the globalists/bankers have full control over all of us.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 5:45 a.m. No.5976678   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5976645

>Silver and gold.

Silver and gold can be confiscated - history proves. And it is not presently a susbstitute for cash - it is not used as a currency.

Cash is harder to eliminate - it's the currency of the working class, many of whom do not have bank accounts or credit cards.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 5:51 a.m. No.5976733   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6747 >>6770

>>5976691

Spiritual things are spiritually discerned - individually and subjectively. Unless you have experienced God you cannot understand. Not is this claim as outrageous as you might think. Consider this: Why do you think that the Bible says: TASTE and see that the Lord is good?

Now imagine that I have never before tasted, say a banana. How will you explain to me "banana-taste?" Fact is, you can't. All you can do is point me to a banana and tell me to taste it for myself. Same is true of knowing God. Until you have "tasted" God, you cannot know him.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 6 a.m. No.5976795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5976747

>It's a circular argument.

>

>To experience God i need to believe. If I don't believe God will not give me a reason toโ€ฆ

 

Not necessarily. The great CS Lewis set out to disprove God. He ended up believing that which he sought to disprove. Read his book "Mere Christianity," - it will open your eyes. God says: seek him and you will find him - he is not far from any of us. Christianity is NOT religion; Christianity is Christ-in-me. A real, working, spiritual union.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 6:36 a.m. No.5977087   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5976974

>Why are liberals so fucking insane?

Because when you remove the concept of objective truth/reality, and eveything is subjective - my truth, my reality - delusion is the only possible outcome. The human mind is not as resilient as atheists/secularists would have us believe. When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing, they believe in anything. Hence the re-emergence of what can only be called superstition which is another word for delusion. And note how superstition and delusion are all fear-based. it is not for no reason that Jesus' most repeated phrase in the NT is "Fear not." Fear is what superstition and delusion latch on to. Faith, on the other hand, is based on God's revelation of objective realilty/truth as revealed in his written word - the Bible - and the incarnate Word - Jesus Christ. And his message is one of hope and redemption and eternal life. It is not a message of fear.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 6:46 a.m. No.5977157   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7217

>>5977122

Ten out of ten for subjecting yourself to the crap that is broadcast by the fake media. Identifying the keywords they use is important. We need not only to identify them but also to use them back against in a way that exposes their perfidy, if anyone has any ideas how this can be done.

Anonymous ID: 58ecad March 30, 2019, 7:12 a.m. No.5977355   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5977177

>from which which bible?

Do you mean, from which translation, because that would be a more accurate question. The Bible, in its oriiginal languages is God's infallible word. Sadly, too many book publishers, recognising the unfailing polularity of the Bible over many centuries, found a way to cash in. The Bible in its KJV translation was well out of copyright. So, as a publisher, what would you do to bring the Bible back into the realm of copyright and money making? What about new, iffy translations? Paraphrases? Gender neutral versions? Don't you see, it's all about money. It's the same as the pharmas who have made it almost impossible for me to buy basic, well known, traditional healing ointments, such as lanolin. Why? Because they can't be patented and pharmas can't make the huge mark-ups they make on patented meds. Same goes with Bible translations. So, stick with the KJV or, at a pinch, if you can't cope with old English, the NKJV which haven't been contaminated by the greed of publishers trying to cash in on copyright.