>>5976589 (lb)
You bring up "Math proofs" and accuse me of being stupid, yet you provide No examples for it…
What is a Math proof in this context?
Last i checked the God people were talking about Isn't an equation.
>>5976589 (lb)
You bring up "Math proofs" and accuse me of being stupid, yet you provide No examples for it…
What is a Math proof in this context?
Last i checked the God people were talking about Isn't an equation.
>>5976593 (lb)
Me making a fool of myself?
I reitterate:
Finding correlations between events in the Bible and History proves nothing of the Bibles supernatural claims.
We have ficticious works today that are based in history… It's not that hard.
Now please come up with a proper argument instead of This circle jerk bullshit.
Did they speak with God? Did they see Jesus perform "miracles"?
Were they devout followers that were easily manipulated? Are their account credible?
Anecdotal evidence is worth jack shit.
To sell it i need to believe i had one in the first place, right?
>you should believe it because I say so. No need to provide a reason.
It Isn't my credibility that is in question. I'm not making supernatural claims…
It's a circular argument.
To experience God i need to believe. If I don't believe God will not give me a reason to…
Real oldfags filter with their brain.
No. What kind of argument is that?
But people have different opinions, here too.
Filtering people that don't share your world-view is the difinition of echo-chamber.
I'm sorry highest ranking Anon for not sharing in on the group-think.
Fuck off…
>Paid by the you.
Needs sauce. No they're paid a flat rate… Kek.
Your shilldar is amazing… Kek.