I filter for expediency of reading, and don't give a fuck about collateral damage either. ID+ for me. As you point out, personal preference. Signal to noise here is near intolerable - typical internet.
The shills are repetitive. I see them (have to see them to filter) so I learn their patterns.
But, the only reason I read here is fast breaking news and hoping to catch an insight.
No doubt I filter out some good info. I don't care. Info gathering is inherently imperfect and given the nature of available content (99.99% garbage), is inefficient.
Gohmert is awesome. Read his remarks on Mueller too.
You know the crooks are going to play games, always giving some justification for doing bad shit. It's what dishonest people do.
Totally agree. I have no objection to the content. I'm just describing how I deal with it. Personal preference.
Pretty bad too, when you realize Horowitz is ostensibly tasked by Congress, yet protects the corrupt institutions he's supposedly watching for Congress.
Mark Levin was going over the historical instances of the government spying on and fucking over political campaigns and perceived political threats (MLK). Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, you know Clinton did. Use IRS against enemies too.
This is what the government does. It is a rotten, poison, no-good apparatus. But, the people tolerate it. Anybody who believes sunlight will disinfect it is nuts. The various abuses have been sunlighted for generations.
https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398634
Robert Mueller: Unmasked
NATSEC, Investigative secrecy, protect the innocent, rule of law … all bullshit used to maintain a grip against the people.
The government lies more than the press does. Sunlight it all day long. Maybe get a few low-level skins slammed into the pokey. The beat goes on. Rome fell, so will the US. Decadent and degenerate, whatever bad befalls the country is deserved.
Gowdy to Dana Purina: next thing, the intelligence community will lose faith in Schiff, and Pelosi will have no choice but to replace him.
Gowdy described the background an bona fides of others on the committee, by a large a group of steely-eyed folks, contrasted with Schiff's hyper-partisanship.
Similar remarks coming form another GOP last night, that the funciton of HPSCI is NOT to look at the president, that lies elsewhere. The HPSCI is supposed to oversight foreign intelligence, which is info about foreign threats, as well as abuses by the intelligence community. None of that is POTUS/Russia related.