Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 12:53 p.m. No.5981205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1212 >>1232 >>1455 >>1632

ATTN PRESS / FAKE NEWS MSM / NEW HERE?

 

There are countless attacks by the media in an orchestrated campaign. We are at war with the corrupt establishment, and they are fighting back with vengeance. There are countless millions devoted to shaping these narratives, much like Fusion GPS, ShareBlue and others.

 

This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.

 

If it is hate based, it is paid / fake

NOTHING Q has said supports these narratives.

 

We are not QAnon

QAnon posts are entirely independent of our research around them. For casual observers, the notables are the primary thing to pay attention to, especially when shaping your opinion. Sometimes we get it wrong and our interpretations shouldn’t be attributed to QAnon.

 

When you see something that’s outrageous or fitting these “narratives”:

You must first understand this is open to anyone, anywhere. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work. The most common are hateful towards a given group or wild or bizarre claims that we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news, Q drops or findings. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. There has even been evidence of “journalists” making such posts themselves for a story, as nothing prevents this. This is intended to support the fake mews narrative that we are loons etc and discourage others from joining us. Everyone knows the Chan’s are the wild west of the internet, so it’s VERY disingenuous to label QAnon based on what is seen here at a glance.

 

The ruse is easy to spot:

Their “narratives” are never in notables.They don’t contribute to any meaningful discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also engage in attacks on other anons who call them out. They have much higher post counts, usually well over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies. This is especially rude when their posts are repeated between threads that could easily be compressed into one post (by linking to prior posts as a courtesy.)

 

Use this tool to help spot this deception:

http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7. Those that do, are more concerned with first impressions from any newcomers and are willing to post the same propaganda 24x7.

 

We encourage you to filter these users and to look at the work in correlation to Q drops at QMAP.PUB and current events.

 

Thanks For Playing, Come Again

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

WWG1WGA

 

>>5966972 (pb) rt >>5966583 (pb) rt >>5966470 (pb)

Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 12:55 p.m. No.5981232   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5981205

 

Threat to Controlled Narrative.

Other than POTUS, can you name a group more attacked than ‘Q’ by the FAKE NEWS media.

Multiple tactics deployed including framing for crimes (think bridge, mob boss, etc etc).

DESPERATION.

Reconcile using logic.

THINK FOR YOURSELF.

DIVIDERS will FAIL.

Q

Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 1:23 p.m. No.5981632   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5981205

Baker…per this, I advise to defer to notables to counter narratives by MSM. I trust your judgment, but expect some effort to get more notables that are off the wall. “Nominated twice, it has to go in” efforts.

 

Ty Baker.

Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 1:36 p.m. No.5981802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1824

>>5981671

I think we have to be careful if notable and making claims that are quickly disproven. I haven’t seen a case where these markers to the second of a speech correlate to Q posts. The odds of POTUS timing something that close is next to 0

Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 1:39 p.m. No.5981850   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5981824

Just seems too much a stretch to say specific people are getting locked up. Looks like a good effort, but at most “Possible hitting of arrests soon?”

Anonymous ID: 1116c7 March 30, 2019, 1:51 p.m. No.5981999   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This seems like a stretch among the notables

>>5981740

>POTUS Rally Decode: CLAS locations, HRC & LDR locked up?

 

I suggest this be more like this if kept…

POTUS Rally Decode: CLAS locations, Hints of Arrests?