Yesterday, tomorrow and today are all -
PEDOVORE BOOGIE TIME
It's GITMO git-down time.
DARK TO LIGHT
TIGHTEN UP.
DOITQ!
Nothing I can do.
Climate Scientist Calls out POTUS
(8 x and still working for him)
When not fabricating evidence for papers on climate science USG EMPLOYEE and UK citizen Ben David Santer has a second job attacking POTUS in Scientific American.
Summary of Ben Santer's last 10 SA articles:
1) Climate Change POTUS won't accept it. Stoopid!
2) POTUS supports a racist border wall that won't work – because of stoopidation of brain.
3)POTUS fails to" test his assumptions against reality" ++estupido
4)President Ozymandias POTUS could limit greenhouse gas emissions but he won't ‘cause Orange Man bad," Stoopidified!
5) The Flood is coming. Keeping citizens safe from floods is POTUS job and he won't do it! Stoopidation is why.
6) "Self-styled 'stable' genius' is a danger to stability! Stupississimus!
7) Alternative Facts about climate change: POTUS uses 'em. ‘Cause stooopid.
8) By rejecting the Paris climate accords POTUS ceded moral leadership of the world to Venezuela or something. More Orange stoopidism.
Out of 10 Ben Santer articles, 8 attack POTUS, all ineptly.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/ben-santer/.
Ben Santer works for US government as a climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Lab. Santer originally worked at the University of East Anglia's climate science lab, which is notorious for pushing questionable papers, and which occupies a dirty Martel tower with grouty tiling on a rundown midlands campus. (see pic)
East Anglia climate labs has reputation a dirty as the cylindrical building they inhabit for fudging the numbers to make papers "Clearer than the truth."
>Santer was the convening Lead Author of Chapter 8 of 1995 IPCC Working Group I Report (AR2 WGI), which addressed the global warming issue.
>Frederick Seitz, in a June 12, 1996 editorial-page piece in the Wall Street Journal complained that alterations made to Chapter 8 of the 1995 IPCC report were made to "deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows human activities are causing global warming." Similar charges were made by the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), a consortium of industry interests; specifically, they accused Santer of "scientific cleansing."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_D._Santer
>On February 25, 2019 Santer et al. published the paper Celebrating the anniversary of three key evens in climate change science in Nature Climate Change, claiming to have reached the 5-sigma "gold standard level" of statistical proof of human influence in global climate change using three sets of satellite data.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es063000t
This fake science pushing Climate Jihadi is not a scientist but an ideologue and almost certainly a cult operator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
The Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as "Climategate")[2][3] began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker,[4][5] copying thousands of emails and computer files, the Climatic Research Unit documents, to various internet locations several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change.
The story was first broken by climate change denialists,[6] with columnist James Delingpole popularising the term "Climategate" to describe the controversy.[7] Several climate-change "skeptics" argued that the emails showed that global warming was a scientific conspiracy and that scientists manipulated climate data and attempted to suppress critics.[8][9] The CRU rejected this, saying that the emails had been taken out of context and merely reflected an honest exchange of ideas.[10][11]
DIG MEME PRAY
Mick Jagger will never tour again, or make another record with RS. He's dead. By absolute, unalterable autocratic order of the bee shaman.