>>5981925 lb

He (Gorka) 'attacks' Q for a reason:

Trump is building awareness for Q, Q's info, the Q movement.

Trump wants Q to get more attention and to go mainstream.

You can do it this way:"Look, Q is so great!"

AND you can create more attention, if you have people that are instructed, to say that "Qis nothing, garbage, a larp, etc."

Trump wants eyes on Q.

Trump instructs HIS 'players' (actors) to talk about Q, to cause a controversy, which makes people DISCUSS Q and thereby drags Q into the public sphere.

>>5982278

Yes.

Make a lot of Kabuki theatre, to draw the attention of the public, where you want it:

At Q.

Trump wants Q to be at the attention of everyone.

And there are two ways to achieve this.

Praise Q.

Condemn Q.

Same result.

People take notice of Q and the Q movement.

Gorka has his part to play, his part is to condemn, mock, ridicule Q.

>>5982619

"Mick Jagger and Tony Blair's link to Prince Andrew 'sex slave'"

Article (from 2015) is about Epstein too.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/418816/Jeffrey-Epstein-Prince-Andrew-sex-scandal

>>5982651

I really didn't want to lecture you, I knew that you already wrote the same in other words.

But I have the feeling that some Anons have a hard time understanding that somebody, who says something "bad" must NOT be automatically be a really "bad actor".