Anonymous ID: e06367 March 30, 2019, 2:34 p.m. No.5982516   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5982220

Have no idea what the RED caps writer is trying to say

Ignore.

But yes, they've got them badly brainwashed with Propaganda

It's amazing to see the level of popular brainwashing.

And regardless of what Lionel tries to spin

There is such a thing as Propaganda

Some of the leftists want to deny they 've been Propagandized.

"Propaganda is merely a fancy word for lies"

No it's not.

 

I watched a YouTube where a network shill was interviewing Sarah Huckabee Sanders. The Talking Head claimed there was a legal dispute regarding "could there be obstruction [of Justice - They leave out the full phase as they do when they describe "QResearch" i.e. "QAnon" - their term, as "conspiracy" instead of "research into criminal conspiracy" the full phrase explains it where as the buzzword is merely a suggestion]

So the fools call the crime "Obstruction" rather than "Obstruction of Justice" Mostly because they are parroting and have no idea what they are talking about.

So it was freaky, the Network talking head said that it was under dispute if or if not there could be "Obstruction of Justice" without a crime.

This is like Clinton parsing "the meaning of 'is'"

Or the French "philosopers" "existentialists" who claim not to know anything.

This is the realm we have entered with these freaks; after a century long build up of their destructive social conditioning / ideology.

I think this goes to Mueller's tricky parcing [that's all they are good at; "sophistry"]

LOGIC

If

no evidence of crime is found

then

you still can't claim there was no crime

since

Lack of Evidence, does not equal,

Evidence of Lack.

So Mueller is using that "possibility"

"It was there but we just didn't find it"

to with hold a pronouncement of

"Exonerated"

So for myself , for instance:

There's no evidence I ever traveled to the North Pole.

But that doesn't prove I wasn't there.

However, if you do not name a crime,

there is no "Obstruction [of Justice]" possible except in imagination.

Guilani was good on Fox,

He explained the criminality of the aides to Mueller very well.

They are bold criminals and Guiliani puts it well.