>>5984348

My theory anon is those are levels of classification. Like you have to be above that level to have that knowledge, in the case of 1-99 you need to be level 100.

Just a theory, I meant to dig on it yesterday but I just did a skim on the WP article.

If there's three levels of classified information, but also code word classification and levels of sensitive information, maybe each level has a numerical score to aid in fine grained compartmentalization.

But yeah, dunno. Maybe lurking milfags are able to confirm, or deny, kek.

>>5984256 (lb)

Kek, though there does seem to be this perception that anyone over the age of 70 is in their "old age". I just had a colleague retire at 75 from a technically challenging job. He probably could have kept going, but hey, who wants to work somewhere until they die right?

With our current state of medical knowledge (or is it 'chrome) we could live to well over 120 in some cases, so 70 could just be the new late middle age.

Not a criticism anon, just an observation. And in the case of Mick Jagger yeah it probably is surprising, kek.

>>5984394

If they want to do it and they're not pushing for others to have to do it (in my country), then I don't care.

If they want it to change and they're in my country, not theirs, I'll rally to their cause.

If it harms no one, they can do what they want.

>>5984574

Ty anon. And here was I thinking WP would provide all the answers, kek.

That's quite a bit to take in.

>>5984637

What about other instances of CLAS, like (pic related)

>>5984972

I took it to mean Q post 241 (pic related)

>>5984990

Kek. Could be that.