>>5984632
But she's also dead.
Did she break it before she was killed?
In that case it wouldn't be funny
>>5983603 pb
I haven't read them all
This jumped out from the
Washington Post article on the Lisa Page interview
They quote her
"“Many of us in law enforcement dislike the subject of our investigations. We are not keen on pedophiles and fraudsters and spies and human traffickers,” Page said. “That is fine. What would be impermissible is to take that harsh language and to act in some way that was illegal or against the rules. And we don’t do it.”
So Lisa implies that what \Trump is or did is as bad as this litany:
Pedophiles
Fraudsters
Spies
human traffickers
in other words she compares her attitude toward POTUS to the attitude she has to actual criminals.
But with them, doncha know, he feelings don't affect how she treats them.
But then what? With someone who is innocent, she also doesn't let her feelings of loathing interfere?
-
it makes no sense; not an accurate comparison.
-
She demeans the POTUS with that comparison.
Is it fair to say that at this point, just ~9months ago, the conspirators had no idea that POTUS would be found innocent?
So Lisa had nothing to fear in answering that way?
They figure they can just deny what they did, even though the evidence points the other way; "Just Because"
They must really think folks are stupid.
"smelly and stupid"
kek
oops.