>>5985073

No, you, tell me.

You are the one making unfounded accusations.

Yes, I went looking for more. I'm a researcher from Qanon. Just like you.

(I'm being sarcastic, and I'm telling you, because I doubt you'd get it).

In an effort of due diligence, as a result of not seeing and actual child pornography, as you claimed.

Maybe anon, linked the wrong page? Lemme double check.

>>5985088

Cool, don't post pictures of your children.

It's actually over 100 pages of photos by a talented fashion photographer.

Interesting that you mention 49 pages though….

See pic related.

I guess you went looking beyond page 26 (your link)

You're still a retard, by the way.

I'm sure you're still around.

>>5985073

>>5985088

>>5985073

>>5985088

As an FYI, there are actually some decent nuggets of info in that feed.

Name connecting, and background stuff, relating to some of our recent digs here.

I'm working on extracting the pertinent stuff, and will report back in a bread or two.

You're still a retard.

(I'll take back my calling you a retard if you can tell me what the actual good info is, from there)