>>5986444

on the subject of Loop Capital

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=128895&privcapId=1250198

Mr. Darrell A. Williams serves as the Chief Operating Officer at Loop Capital Markets LLC. Mr. Williams is the Founder and Managing Director at DuSable Capital. He served as the President at DuSable Capital Inc. since January 2004. He serves as an Advisor and Consultant to numerous private companies. Mr. Williams served as Vice President of Venture Capital at Ameritech Development Corporation. As Vice President of venture capital, he executed, managed and liquidated early stage venture capital investments in a diverse array of emerging telecom-related businesses. At Ameritech, Mr. Williams executed early stage venture capital investments in wireless communications equipment, internet content, electronic commerce, vertical applications and electronic security. At the firm, he also executed strategic investment, acquisition and divestiture assignments for ADC's parent company. He served as Chief Investment Officer of TDF Ventures. He served at Ameritech Development Corporation from 1992 to 1999. Mr. Williams also served as an Assistant Vice President in the mergers and acquisitions department of First National Bank of Chicago following employment with Dean Witters Reynolds. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Williams served as a Director of Mergers and Acquisitions Group at SBC Venture Capital Corp. and was involved in projects in wireless communications, voice messaging, network management software, independent local exchange carrier operations and competitive local transport. Mr. Williams began his career as a Corporate Finance Associate at Morgan Stanley DW Inc. He serves as a Director of HandSignal and ProofSpace, Inc. He is a Member of Urban Students Empowered Foundation's Board of Directors and serves as a Board Director to numerous private companies. He served as Director of Intrado, Inc., since January 2000. He served as a Director of Invertix Corporation and Altamira Technologies Corporation. Throughout his investment activities, Mr. Williams has served on the Boards of Directors of 12 companies and one investment fund partnership. As a public company Independent Director, Mr. Williams supervised governance level financial reporting activities and reviewed the work of third-party valuation service providers. Mr. Williams possesses over 30 years of investment, financial advisory and corporate finance experience for entities in industries, ranging from start-ups to successful publicly traded companies. He has completed and managed direct venture capital investments and has executed transactions at every level of the capital structure, through both private transactions (mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, private placements and business valuations) and public securities offerings. He holds Series 7, 24, 79 and 63 licenses. Mr. Williams received his B.S. from DePaul University's College of Commerce and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

COO of Loop and formerly of Ameritech…

and wouldn't you know it-→

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=bobama&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult

so the anomaly on the HRC crapper server…

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-228607

It's been known since last year that Obama and Clinton corresponded occasionally via her private account, but the White House has insisted Obama did not know she relied on it routinely and exclusively for official business.

A report on the FBI's June 7, 2016 interview with "Guccifer" confirms FBI Director James Comey's claim that Lazar falsely asserted that he'd surreptitiously accessed Clinton's server.

"Lazar began by stating that he had never claimed to hack the Clinton server. [An FBI agent] then advised that Fox News had recently published an article which reported that Lazar had claimed to hack the Clinton server. Lazar then stated that he recalled the interview with Fox News, and that he had lied to them about hacking the Clinton server."

and furthermore..

https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/commentary/the-clinton-state-departments-major-security-breach-everyone-ignoring

The media, however, virtually ignored another exchange between Gohmert and Strzok that revealed a potential bombshell. Gohmert asked Strzok about his meeting in 2016 with Frank Rucker and Janette McMillan, an investigator and lawyer, respectively, for then-Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough (an Obama appointee).

McCullough sent them to see Strzok, who was the FBI’s deputy assistant director for the Counterintelligence Division, to brief him and three other FBI personnel about an “anomaly” that their forensic analysis had found in Clinton’s server.

According to Gohmert, the inspector general discovered that, with four exceptions, “every single one” of Clinton’s emails—more than 30,000—“were going to an address that was not on the distribution list.”

In other words, according to the information Gohmert received from the intelligence inspector general, something was causing Clinton’s server to send copies of all of her email communications outside of the country “to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia.”

If true, this means that Clinton’s email communication with her top aides, department leadership, ambassadors, and other officials, including President Barack Obama, may have been read by an alien entity, perhaps a foreign power hostile to the United States. That could include confidential, sensitive, and even classified information about our foreign policy or our allies.

Gohmert’s exchange with Strzok doesn’t reveal who the foreign entity is, but if not the Russians, the likely culprit is the Chinese government, which has a special unit of hackers within its military that has long targeted the U.S.

>>5986797

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/01/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-emails-key-decision-not-indict-hillary/

So how did Obama and his helpers “clean this up”?

Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House insisted that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, of course; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit: Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information, and (2) to avoid using the term “executive privilege” — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.

Note that claims of executive privilege must yield to demands for disclosure of relevant evidence in criminal prosecutions. But of course, that’s not a problem if there will be no prosecution.

The White House purported to repair the president’s disingenuous statement in the CBS interview by rationalizing that he had meant that he learned of Clinton’s homebrew server system through news reports — he hadn’t meant to claim unawareness that she occasionally used private email. This was sheer misdirection: From Obama’s standpoint, the problem was that he discussed government intelligence matters with the secretary of state through a private email account; the fact that, in addition, Clinton’s private email account was connected to her own private server system, rather than some other private email service, was beside the point. But, again, the media was not interested in such distinctions and contentedly accepted the White House’s non-explanation.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Loretta Lynch ordered Comey to use the word “matter” rather than “investigation” to describe the FBI’s probe of Clinton’s email practices. This ensured that the Democratic administration’s law-enforcement agencies were aligning their story with the Democratic candidate’s campaign rhetoric. If there was no investigation, there would be no prosecution.

In April 2016, in another nationally televised interview, Obama made clear that he did not want Clinton to be indicted. His rationale was a legally frivolous straw man: Clinton had not intended to harm national security. This was not an element of the felony offenses she had committed; nor was it in dispute. No matter: Obama’s analysis was the stated view of the chief executive. If, as was sure to happen, his subordinates in the executive law-enforcement agencies conformed their decisions to his stated view, there would be no prosecution.

Within a few weeks, even though the investigation was ostensibly still underway and over a dozen key witnesses — including Clinton herself — had not yet been interviewed, the FBI began drafting Comey’s remarks that would close the investigation. There would be no prosecution.

On June 27, Lynch met with Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, on an out-of-the-way Arizona tarmac, where their security details arranged for both their planes to be parked.

>>5986850

it is a function built in. If it was going to an outside foreign entity, it was altered to do so.

Gohmert's questioning had it that

https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398647

Gohmert: Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney, that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list. It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?

Strozk: Sir, I don’t.

Gohmert: He went on the explain it. And you didn’t say anything, you thanked him, you shook his hand. The problem is it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia and from what you’ve said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton. So the forensic examination was done by the ICIG — and they can document that — but you were given that information and you did nothing with it. And one of the things I found most egregious with Mr. Horowitz’s testimony, and — by the way Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call.

>>5986884

all emails except 4 out of 30,000 sent.

https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398647

I'll bet these were emails about Hills doing Momma June's yoga routine either.

>>5986997

yes, nuts.

What was it last year that it was said there is no evidence her server had been compromised?

Whoever it was getting the emails, didn't have to do anything but check their inbox…

"Oh Shit"

https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/22/fbi-ignored-golden-emails-and-abedin-messages/

Now we know by October 4, the New York office had found 700,000 emails. The New York agents had seen and reported to FBI leadership they had seen email headers, all domain names, Mrs. Clinton’s initials on one sensitive but not classified document, and the missing BlackBerry backups.

The New York agents described it as the “entire file” of all Hillary Clinton emails from 2006 until 2016, including the BlackBerry messages that Comey himself had referred to as “the golden emails.”

The “mid-year team” of FBI agents investigating the email issues had been told by Clinton’s staff and lawyers that there was a complete archive on both a thumb drive and a laptop, but remarkably, no one seemed to have them. At least some on the mid-year team were frustrated and believed Clinton’s attorneys were lying. Others, including Comey, claimed they were looking for those under every “stone” but no one could find them.

Remember: Hillary Clinton’s attorneys produced approximately 30,000 of her emails, and they appear to have claimed that was the entirety of her work-related emails. Mrs. Clinton, staff and technical support had deliberately deleted approximately 33,000 emails that were just about “yoga” and “wedding plans.” They produced nothing from the beginning of her tenure as Secretary of State. Then, her server was wiped with “BleachBit.”

et, lo and behold, here so many emails were. Hundreds of thousands of emails, the “entire file” — everything Clinton — including data from the BlackBerrys and other devices for which the FBI and DOJ decided not to run search warrants because they “assumed” they had been destroyed.

So what did the FBI do with this “explosive” “bomb” including the “golden emails” on the BlackBerry that everyone knew was missing from the production?

Nothing — at least nothing to obtain evidence.

There was a flurry of activity at Headquarters. Strzok-Page texts show that Strzok, McCabe and Priestap discussed the Weiner laptop among themselves shortly after the “bomb” dropped in the video conference that day. In fact, Priestap and Strzok were waiting outside McCabe’s office to discuss it while McCabe was with Comey. There were also two calls between Comey and McCabe that evening.

and for added faculty staff bonus…

https://townhall.com/columnists/justinhaskins/2018/01/29/did-barack-obama-obstruct-justice-in-clinton-email-case-n2440943

As Andrew McCarthy noted on Tuesday in National Review, a letter issued over the weekend by Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) discusses a draft of Comey’s statement about the Clinton email investigation that is dated June 30, 2016. This draft differs, at least in one way, substantially from the infamous statement Comey made on July 5, during which he recommended no charges be brought against Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server. In the draft, Comey mentions that President Obama had communicated with Clinton while she served as secretary of state and “was on the territory of … an adversary”:

“We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent,” the draft statement reads. “She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.”

By the time the July 5 statement was issued letting Clinton off the hook, any mention of emails made by Obama to Clinton’s un-secure email account had been removed from Comey’s statement, which is extremely fortunate for Obama, because if he did knowingly discuss classified information with Clinton through unsecured emails, he could also be investigated for violating federal laws forbidding such reckless activity. And there’s evidence Obama may have attempted to cover his tracks by having his e-mails sealed under the guise of executive privilege. McCarthy explains:

“Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House insisted that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, of course; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit: Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information and (2) to avoid using the term ‘executive privilege’ — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.”

Obama’s emails were sealed not long after he told CBS News in 2015 he found out about Clinton’s private email server at the “same time everybody else learned it through news reports.” This is important because emails produced by WikiLeaks show top Democrats and members of Obama’s team reacted in a panic to the former president’s false statement. (Remember, we know Obama had personally emailed Clinton’s private email address.) Cheryl Mills, one of Clinton’s top lawyers told John Podesta, “we need to clean this up – he [Obama] has emails from her [Clinton] - they do not say state.gov.” (State.gov indicates an email is an official government email address.)

With all these pieces in place, it’s easy to see why Obama wouldn’t want Clinton to be prosecuted for illegally using a private email server. This isn’t purely speculative. Obama said in an interview with “Fox News Sunday” in April 2016, in the midst of the FBI’s Clinton investigation, he didn’t think the allegations against Clinton were nearly as serious as everyone else did.

“I continue to believe she has not jeopardized America’s national security,” Obama said. “There’s a carelessness in terms of managing emails that she has owned and she recognizes. But I also think it is important to keep this in perspective.”

Then, Obama went on the campaign trail for Clinton, serving as another signal that he didn’t think Clinton “jeopardized America’s national security.”

>>5987202

I remember this statement attributed to the NYPD Chief…

“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”