>>5988837 (pb)
I think "Blockade removal [Scaramucci' model]" was a reasonable prediction that didn't play out. Using Whittaker to 'cajole' Mueller into winding up did not pan out, because holdouts in DOJ composed a letter that the press successfully but dishonestly parlayed into "Whittaker rejected DOJ advice to recuse."
Eventual blockade removal was by Barr, and I don't think Barr is under the Scaramucci "hatchet man" model.
Reasonable link, especially given that a good part of the public WRONGLY believes that indictment venue can be shifted away from the crime.
Indictments, sealed or not, would be outside of DC only if the crime can be claimed to have occurred outside of DC. No doubt that is true for many DS actions, but the natural geographic focus of DS activity to take Trump out will be DC.
This article accepts as FACT, that Trump interfered with investigations into his conduct during the campaign. Every conclusion and concern voiced in the article depends on finding that fact.
Put Mike Lillis in the cohort of people who are incapable of telling the truth. Presumption of flasehood. Burden is on the READER to research Lillis' claims, and chances are, you will find his claims are misleading. He cites the Lester Holt interview for the proposition that Trump fired Comey to stop the investigation. In the Holt interview, Trump said firing Comey would PROLONG the investigation, and by golly, Trump was right.
https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/01/death-of-russiagate-mueller-team-tied-to-mifsuds-network/
People dig for self-education. People who rely on the press for being informed are grossly misinformed.
https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/01/death-of-russiagate-mueller-team-tied-to-mifsuds-network/
More legible, sorry for the previous …