dChan
Anonymous ID: 11d847 March 31, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.5990108   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0126 >>0165 >>0207 >>0231 >>0325 >>0542 >>0724

RUSH LIMBAUGH ON HANNITY MUELLER WAS NEVER CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION THIS WAS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A DEEP STATE COUP ATTEMPT

 

Rush Limbaugh spoke on the Sean Hannity show last night on Fox on a variety of subjects. But he was particularly fired up about the results of the Mueller investigation and the Socialist and their liberal press co-conspirators refusal to accept the results. Rush said the Mueller investigation never was an investigation. It was always a deep state coup attempt .

And the scary part is it is an ongoing deep state coup attempt.

 

Rush laid out the evidence going back to John Brennan. The only the that is fuzzy is how involved Barack Hussein Obama was in the deep state coup. But it was clear from the beginning when FBI agent Peter Strzok text his skank married girlfriend Lisa Page that they needed an insurance policy if Trump won.

 

Hannity asked Rush if he was talking about a coup attempt.

 

RUSH: It is totally scary. I don’t think the American people understand. This was not — ladies and gentlemen, don’t doubt me here — it was not an investigation. There was never any evidence of collusion. Robert Mueller took this gig and opened his investigation without evidence. There was no evidence. He wasn’t even given a specific crime to pursue. It was open-ended. It was go find a crime because there weren’t any crimes that had been committed. But what we just went through was not an investigation.

 

Robert Mueller has known for a minimum, folks, of 18 months that there was no collusion. Why did he not shut it down 18 months ago? Why did he take the gig? He took the job knowing there was no collusion. The only collusion — we’ve been saying it ad infinitum — is Hillary Clinton with the Russians and Steele creating this dossier, and they try to pass this off as legitimate intel.

 

You talked about Brennan earlier. He met with the House Democrats yesterday. This isn’t over as far as they’re concerned. And Brennan is the guy who passed the dossier to Harry Reid. Everybody thinks it was McCain, and McCain played a role in this. But this was not an investigation. This was a coup. This was an attempt to find a crime. And the fact that they couldn’t with all of this money and 19 people on his investigative team, at least the lawyers who were from the anti-Trump camp, the donors to Hillary Clinton, and they couldn’t find anything.

 

Sean, ladies and gentlemen, you have to know the passage in the Mueller report where it says: “numerous entreaties were made by Russians to the Trump campaign, but the Trump campaign –” that’s not what happened. What happened is the FBI attempted to plant their own informers in the Trump campaign, one of them named Stefan Halper, a Cambridge professor, MI6, U.K., they tried to get him hired in the foreign policy advisory role here during the campaign, and fortunately whoever interviewed him didn’t hire him.

 

If he had been hired and they tried to get two other people, if they had been hired, guess what they would have done? They would have started communicating with Russian agents they know, and then there would have been the collusion that the FBI was trying to create. There wasn’t any. This is worse than anybody is being led to believe it is, because it’s being called an investigation and Trump passed the test, they didn’t find anything.

 

The next investigation needs to involve the Obama DOJ and Crooked Hillary Clinton. James Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page being in GITMO would be a good start. then go after Obama and Crooked Hillary. That is the only way to assure we never again have a deep state coup attempt.

 

https://elephantaddress.com/2019/03/rush-limbaugh-on-hannity-mueller-was-never-conducting-an-investigation-this-was-and-always-has-been-a-deep-state-coup-attempt/

Anonymous ID: 11d847 March 31, 2019, 7:10 a.m. No.5990356   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0542 >>0724

President Trump’s Battle With ‘Obamacare’ Moves To The Courts

After losing in Congress, President Donald Trump is counting on the courts to kill off “Obamacare.” But some cases are going against him, and time is not on his side as he tries to score a big win for his re-election campaign. Two federal judges in Washington, D.C., this past week blocked parts of Trump’s health care agenda: work requirements for some low-income people on Medicaid, and new small business health plans that don’t have to provide full benefits required by the Affordable Care Act.

But in the biggest case, a federal judge in Texas ruled last December that the ACA is unconstitutional and should be struck down in its entirety. That ruling is now on appeal. At the urging of the White House, the Justice Department said this past week it will support the Texas judge’s position and argue that all of “Obamacare” must go. A problem for Trump is that the litigation could take months to resolve — or longer — and there’s no guarantee he’ll get the outcomes he wants before the 2020 election. “Was this a good week for the Trump administration? No,” said economist Gail Wilensky, who headed up Medicare under former Republican President George H.W. Bush. “But this is the beginning of a series of judicial challenges.” It’s early innings in the court cases, and “the clock is going to run out,” said Timothy Jost, a retired law professor who has followed the Obama health law since its inception. “By the time these cases get through the courts there simply isn’t going to be time for the administration to straighten out any messes that get created, much less get a comprehensive plan through Congress,” added Jost, who supports the ACA.

 

In the Texas case, Trump could lose by winning. If former President Barack Obama’s health law is struck down entirely, Congress would face an impossible task: pass a comprehensive health overhaul to replace it that both Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Trump can agree to. The failed attempt to repeal “Obamacare” in 2017 proved to be toxic for congressional Republicans in last year’s midterm elections and they are in no mood to repeat it. “The ACA now is nine years old and it would be incredibly disruptive to uproot the whole thing,” said Thomas Barker, an attorney with the law firm Foley Hoag, who served as a top lawyer at the federal Health and Human Services department under former Republican President George W. Bush. “It seems to me that you can resolve this issue more narrowly than by striking down the ACA.” Trump seems unfazed by the potential risks. “Right now, it’s losing in court,” he asserted Friday, referring to the Texas case against “Obamacare.” The case “probably ends up in the Supreme Court,” Trump continued. “But we’re doing something that is going to be much less expensive than Obamacare for the people … and we’re going to have (protections for) pre-existing conditions and will have a much lower deductible. So, and I’ve been saying that, the Republicans are going to end up being the party of health care.” There’s no sign that his administration has a comprehensive health care plan, and there doesn’t seem to be a consensus among Republicans in Congress. A common thread in the various health care cases is that they involve lower-court rulings for now, and there’s no telling how they may ultimately be decided. Here’s a status check on major lawsuits:

 

— “Obamacare” Repeal

U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth, Texas, ruled that when Congress repealed the ACA’s fines for being uninsured, it knocked the constitutional foundation out from under the entire law. His ruling is being appealed by attorneys general from Democratic-led states to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The challenge to the ACA was filed by officials from Texas and other GOP-led states. It’s now fully supported by the Trump administration, which earlier had argued that only the law’s protections for people with pre-existing conditions and its limits on how much insurers could charge older, sicker customers were constitutionally tainted. All sides expect the case to go to the Supreme Court, which has twice before upheld the ACA.

 

— Medicaid Work Requirements

U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington, D.C., last week blocked Medicaid work requirements in Kentucky and Arkansas approved by the Trump administration. The judge questioned whether the requirements were compatible with Medicaid’s central purpose of providing “medical assistance” to low-income people. He found that administration officials failed to account for coverage losses and other potential harm, and sent the Health and Human Services Department back to the drawing board. The Trump administration says it will continue to approve state requests for work requirements, but has not indicated if it will appeal.

more https://www.wbal.com/article/380850/2/president-trumps-battle-with-obamacare-moves-to-the-courts

Anonymous ID: 11d847 March 31, 2019, 7:21 a.m. No.5990418   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5990207

> the Fake News propagandist are as much to blame as the bastards attempting the coup because they knowingly push their bs lies

 

KNOWINGLY

Exactly

Anonymous ID: 11d847 March 31, 2019, 7:44 a.m. No.5990598   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0626 >>0686 >>0707 >>0719 >>0724 >>0781

Mulvaney defends Trump's Central America aid cuts: 'We would like them to do more'

 

Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney defended Sunday the administration’s move to cut off aid to a trio of Central America countries, saying they need to “do more” to stop the migrant caravans sending thousands to the U.S. border.

The State Department said Saturday it would seek to suspend 2017 and 2018 payments to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, where thousands of citizens have joined migrant caravans, prompting complaints that funding cuts would only make the problem worse.

 

Mr. Mulvaney said the problem is getting worse even with U.S. aid to Mexico and Central America. The White House pledged in December an additional $10 billion to assist those countries in keeping their citizens from flooding the U.S. southern border.

“If we are going to give these countries hundreds of millions of dollars, we would like them to do more,” said Mr. Mulvaney on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “That, Jake, I would respectfully submit to you is not an unreasonable position. We could prevent a lot of what’s happening on the southern border by preventing people from moving into Mexico in the first place.”

 

Asked by CNN host Jake Tapper about “experts in your own administration” who say the aid is making the countries more stable, Mr. Mulvaney said the evidence shows it’s not working. He also described those making such claims as “career staffers.”

“If it’s working so well, why are the people still coming? Why are these historic numbers — again, 100,000 people will cross the border this month alone,” Mr. Mulvaney said. “That is a crisis. It’s a humanitarian crisis, it’s a security crisis. I think at least now people are starting to realize that we were not exaggerating a couple months ago when we had this nationwide debate on the wall.”

The three countries, known as the Northern Triangle, would lose about $700 million aid under the administration’s plan, according to Reuters.

 

Mr. Trump has threatened to cut off aid to the countries in the past, tweeting in December, “Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador are doing nothing for the United States but taking our money” and citing reports about the formation of another migrant caravan in Honduras.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/31/mick-mulvaney-defends-trump-central-america-aid-cu/