Anonymous ID: 386347 March 31, 2019, 6:47 a.m. No.5990188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0193

>>5989991

Yep- I guess I’m a shill because I hate the idea of 5g. No one ever mentions how colliding signals/frequencies create new signals/frequencies. They also never mention that 5G is continuous exposure, 24\7, when they claim UHF won’t harm you. There’s a reason techs who work in Rf all the time where badges (Rf signal detectors) like X-ray techs for radiation to monitor exposure.

Anonymous ID: 386347 March 31, 2019, 7:16 a.m. No.5990385   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0424 >>0603

>>5990302

Changed search tactics- here’s one but don’t know source at all. Looking for others- swore GP had article on it…

 

https://e-militia.com/index.php/2019/02/05/exposed-msm-layoffs-and-obamas-propaganda-machine/

Anonymous ID: 386347 March 31, 2019, 7:26 a.m. No.5990453   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5990424

Yeah. Thank modern journalism… congress.org isn’t showing info I’m looking for on the modernization act which seems odd. Checking archives now since anons are better than MSM for info.

Anonymous ID: 386347 March 31, 2019, 7:58 a.m. No.5990728   🗄️.is 🔗kun

For those interested in RF exposure from mobile devices, I have included links so you can research for yourself. The exposure limit for a human is 1.6W/kg (SAR level). You can lookup any device you have the FCC ID of here: https://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid. Do not forget to include the “-“ in the number if there is one.

 

Now, after reviewing the output of your device, think of a normal daily situation where there are hotspots in the building and people with cellphones and laptops around you. Now consider that Rf is cumulative within a space. The FCC verifies SAR output compliance for INDIVIDUAL devices in a sterile environment (no other signals). Is this safe? You tell me.