Wtaf?
>There are a few free-speaking anons here
Yet you're adding yet another voice repeating this "Dear MSM pls stahp calling us haters pleeeez" bs spam? Are you claiming to be one of the "free-speakers?"
>NOTHING Q has said supports a hate-based narrative.
Ffs sake stop using their gotcha words as tho it does us any favors. They're called GOTCHA words cuz there's no way you're not good and caught if you come anywhere near them.
The term "hate" is so broad and undefined, it can be used to mean anything by anyone at any time. THAT'S why they fucking coined it. We don't have laws against "hate speech" in this country for a reason, bc it's a stand-in for political dissent, which is the very thing our Free Speech 1st amendment was designed to protect.
NEVER represent yourself, either in affirmation or denial, on the enemy's terms. Appealing to a sense of fair play they don't have is like reading the bible to a bear after he's already started eating you. MSM can accuse us of whatever they like, the key is not to care, to define yourself on YOUR terms always and only, the more objective and absent emotional innuendo the better:
We criticize public figures using reason and evidence
or our we no violenz disclaimer at the top of every bread:
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.