https://www.instagram.com/p/Bvr9IQznUOY/

different photo / cropped? from instagram

(repost per baker request)

>>5996191

>>5996216

>>5996251 (lb)

normal? she looks in pain to me. Also weird that no other person posted an image of her there.

>>5996317

different photo than from her IG account.

>>5996270

oops posted the wrong IG one in this bread, miscopied from last bread.

hopefully it works now 1080x1080

>>5996358

ah, maybe, see the twitter one for reference

>>5996407

she has a blogger account in her name (whether that's really her or not i have no idea) that seems to be pro Q/Trump … weird.

http://www.dannielleblumenthal.com/

>>5996486

kek

>>5996475

so it would seem

>>5996514

i looked at the exif data for both and they were scrubbed clean and a reverse image search brought up nothing except her images.

>>5996562

he does have it on his website

http://www.andyblumenthal.com/

only significant info from exif

Exif Byte Order : Little-endian (Intel, II)

Software : Google

>>5996706

kek

>>5996714

She would prefer you call her Jane Denver now you insensitive Clod kek

>>5996736

my thoughts originally in the same vein, couldn't find much with reverse image searches.

>>5996744

>https://twitter.com/faniaoz/status/1112483993075830786

same image as blumenthal

>>5996806

if they did nothing was made public, though you'd imagine Q team could probably ferret it out.

>>5996704

maybe but what are the odds that she would magically be in a position to get a photo with RBG?

Could be wrong but almost feels like they chose a Q sympathizer to make us feel like it's the real deal

>>5996877

>>5996704