No space after the word "others," but there are spaces after each word at other line breaks.
It's a CR. Inadvertent or on purpose? I vote fat finger.
I agree with you on indictments and trials taking years to play out, but I expect to see action long before the midterms. OIG report, declass, those things likely in next half a year at most. Will make at least a minor intrusion on the press-selected narrative, and I think will make a substantial intrusion and upending. The public is fed up with BS. The DEM liars look big only because they have a meagaphone and they cheat like hell in elections.
The normal formatting of the display has the space between words appearing at the end of a line instead of at the start of the next line. Line break locations vary depending on the display device and font size. I can change the line break locations here by changing font size (Ctl+, Ctl- keycombo), but end of line is always either a space, or no-space-hard CR.
We already have some RR testimony on that count. He signed it without reading or challenging it.
I find the kabuki theater humorous. Witnesses will use sophistry to mislead, Depends on what the meaning of "is" is. Inquisitors will use care to preserve the illusion that the system has integrity. Pubic trust is the end goal, not truth. You can fool some of the people all of the time.
The fakery will continue as long as the public tolerates it, which will be until the food runs out.
Your stabbing spree was all over the news yesterday, swordy
No spaces. The highlight shows every character, including spaces. There are ZERO spaces highlighted after the word "others." There is exactly one space at the end of the other lines.
Gathering evidence is the job of the investigators (FBI), not the prosecutors. In fact, there is a trap in prosecutors gathering evidence, it pierces prosecutorial immunity. Prosecutors PRESENT evidence to GJ, and decide whether or not ro charge.
Understood that the legal framework doesn't show that Huber is handling the cases; but it does show that "absence of investigation directly by Huber" isn't support for a conclusion that Huber is not engaged with investigators who may be working to uncover DS fuckery.
All that said, I do not trust the system to come clean about itself. It is designed to protect itself and to excuse all but the most extreme misconduct and abuse. I view the system as basically dishonest. It's autohrity is force-based, not morality-based.
I've been mentally preparing a demand for my rep/senators. I generally ask for a written response, just for kicks because they are NEVER responsive. It's good to send the request for response in writing, too. Much more effective than a phone call.
In this case, there are accusations that members of the Obama administration engaged in activities that are unconstitutional (unmasking snoop w/o warrant), illegal, and unethical in order to affect the outcome of a presidential election.
Does the rep/senator take these allegations seriously? And f so, what is going to be done to ward restoring public confidence that the government is not using its power to subvert the will of the people? (that is an open question, inviting an extended narrative response). Why should the public have any confidence at all that Congressional action is effective on this sort of matter? Past efforts, see Church Committee promise to never use the power of the government to undertake unconstitutional snooping, and here we are, with an allegation the government not only snooped, but planted evidence, snooped, leaked to the press, and all of that to affect the outcome of an election. Why should we believe this is not "normal" conduct by the government? Use of IRS to target political opponents is another example of government aiming to control political conduct.
Why should the people trust or even tolerate a government that is elected by use of government trickery?
People finally adjusted to DST. I'm up early/usual clock time this morning for the first time since DST started.