Anons looky what just got released - Barrs position on Mueller and obstruction in response to Senate questions
destroyed the obstruction theory in advance
watching a movie
LOL!
handpicked indeed
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/549-june-2018-barr-memo-to-doj-mue/b4c05e39318dd2d136b3/optimized/full.pdf
APRIL FOOLS SUCKERS!
LAWFAG HERE
this is just a proof of service
documenting some FOIA requests vs DOJ
process only
Fucking ignorant anons should not post
president buttafucka?
ok ill be glad when april fools days is over
Barr told the Senate back in June 2018 that Mueller's obstruction theory was complete CRAP and telegraphed the final decision just reached - KEK
Sauce
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/549-june-2018-barr-memo-to-doj-mue/b4c05e39318dd2d136b3/optimized/full.pdf
Key summary
Mueller is proposing an unprecedented expansion of obstruction laws so as to reach facially-lawful actions taken by the President in exercising the discretion vested in him by the Constitution.
It appears Mueller is relying on 18 U.S.C. §1512, which generally prohibits acts undermining the integrity of evidence or preventing its production.
Section 1512 is relevant here because, unlike other obstruction statutes, it does not require that a proceeding be actually “pending” at the time of an obstruction, but only that a defendant have in mind an anticipated proceeding.
Because there were seemingly no relevant proceedings pending when the President allegedly engaged in the alleged obstruction.
While these controversies have heretofore been waged largely on the field of political combat, Mueller’s sweeping obstruction theory would now open the way for the “criminalization” of these disputes.
Predictably, challenges to the Department's decisions will be accompanied by claims that the Attorney General, or other supervisory officials, are “obstructing” justice because their directions are improperly motivated.
Whenever the slightest colorable claim of a possible “improper motive” is advanced, there will be calls for a criminal investigation into possible “obstruction.”
The prospect of being accused of criminal conduct, and possibly being investigated for such, would inevitably cause officials “to shrink” from making potentially controversial decisions.
the plan has been in polace for so long anons
another Barr gem from 1995 outlining what he will do to the DS criminals in 2010
https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2355&context=tcl
key summary
In the face of such a pervasive popular culture, mass media, and
powerful state that sees itself as a secular institution alleviating the consequences of misconduct and often promoting moral relativism, how canwe be confident that the pendulum will swing back? In a sense, I have
painted a very bleak but realistic picture. The real message is that we
are going to have to do more than joust around the margins. We must reenter the fray in an effective way; take the battlefield and enter the
struggle, rather than just retire in good order. The key is a return to
basics-in a sense, to reassemble the flock…