>>6005381 (/pb)
Thanks for the article. Glad someone's pointing this shit out for what it is
>>6005381 (/pb)
Thanks for the article. Glad someone's pointing this shit out for what it is
Eyes on, Anon…
No one in [RBG] spot for the first 55 minutes. In minute 57, poof!
Attaching 2m 15s clip, from 55:13 → 57:28.
She sure as hell made it down there fast…
>Yes, this is "her". This is "supposed" to be RBG. Do with the image what you will, but this is the pew location currently in dispute.
Also, "Ruth" materialized, on the front row, in two minutes and fifteen seconds. Blazin' fast for old chick on the deathbed.
Do with that what you will.
Again, this is the image claimed to be "her". Not arguing for/against proof of life, only that "her" materializes on the front row almost an hour in, two minutes after the cameras were last on that spot.