Find the exact date he started and we can narrow down much.
I think we need to look at this laterally and how it connects to what took place in China and Russia AFTER Snowden went traitor and why that matters to the Obama traitors. In a phrase - plausible deniability for what I am about to state.
Remember all the undercover agents in China and Russia who were outed and killed after Snowden's "defection"? Obama ilk use Snowden to shift the eyes of blame to him while, in truth, it is them who are selling tech advances, telling foreign countries of our deep undercover assets and weakening America. Snowden gets all the press and blame and the DS gets no attention.
>What about the father/daughter Russians poisoned foaming at the mouth on a park bench in the news?
I think it is very safe to assume the Obama ilk sold out every last foreign asset. Consider this laterally again and consider the steel issue, the defective guidance chips, the defective drones that the army recalled, etc. Obama was the hammer that weakened the US and, in this case, Snowden was the nail to shift eyes off the administration (who would have access to that knowledge) to someone else (Snowden) who would also have access to such information.
It's what I would do.
Undoubtedly accurate.
You know this does raise an interesting scavenger hunt into Snowden's background but it really would take all of us because what I am about to post will, without a single doubt, get ((them)) in play to delete and control everything on the web in that regard.
We know the general age of Snowden, we know his "background" makes no sense considering his career path, we also know kids are raised for these things and always start as crisis actors first… so… we can consider potential false flags from, what, about 20 years ago (Idaho, Waco, etc) and see if any pictures remain and a young "Snowden" was in play.
I know it's a fucking bitch and a ton of work but if we're going to do this right than we have to do it right and check into every damn thing.
Didn't Swowden claim, at one point, to work exclusively with Prova?
Although him withholding the "B" likely means he is picking option "B" but it should be noted he did claim Prova background at one point.
Holy fuck… what are those!?
Agreed. Not to mention he could report his marching orders which would bring down the whole fucking house. We will get him, one way or another.
FUCK! I was wondering about some reference to broken chains. Look at my post above. Five days ago that was posted and it was the thing I couldn't make sense of. Man….