I like seeing the call for release the HRC video…but how is that going to work? In theory, if the video is released, leaked, or whatever, it will be illegal to watch it. How do people see something that can easily have them jailed for viewing it? It likely needs a high level person to publically describe it and confirm it.

>>601258

Yes, cause rumors are all we have at this point, and child abuse/porn is about the only thing that could take HRC down with certainty. There's just no way to spin it.

>>601252

Cause the rumor is it's her with a child, which means it's child porn, which is illegal to download/stream. Watching it isn't exactly illegal, but how are you going to watch it without downloading/streaming it?

>>601272

CNN is full if shit. This is possibly child porn, so whole different ball park if that's the case. Child porn is illegal to possess in the US. Downloading/streaming it qualifies as possessing it.

>>601366

Could be, and it will accomplish nothing if that's the case. HRC will just say she was joking. Sure it will be a lie, but it's enough to hold up in court and MSM to shield them with.

>>601373

Maybe, but I doubt it. There's already enough with emails and whatnot to cover the corruption angle. She can lie her wait out of such a video just like they've done for decades with everything else. Something involving a kid though, there's just no lie/spin out of that. Well, unless they claim the video is fake and edited with a cgi HRC in it.

>>601371

I don't know. There's a mountain of shit already that has never stuck to the Clintons, they could probably still dodge a tarmac video.